Showing 2,501 - 2,520 results of 4,658 for search 'significantly ((((((lower decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (teer decrease))) OR (linear decrease))', query time: 0.37s Refine Results
  1. 2501

    Table 1_Association between serum albumin and severe impairment of activities of daily living in patients with stroke: a cross-sectional study.docx by Ranran Bi (20505614)

    Published 2025
    “…However, when serum albumin levels were greater than or equal to 38.0 g/L, the severe impairment of ADLs no longer decreased with rising serum albumin levels.</p>Conclusion<p>In summary, an L-shaped connection with an approximate inflection point of 38.0 g/L was found between blood albumin levels and significant ADL impairment in stroke patients. …”
  2. 2502

    Table 1_Effects of two kinds of vestibular function training on reducing motion sickness in college students.docx by Linyao Shi (20684204)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>After training, both groups’ Graybiel scores, blood pressure, high-frequency power (HF), and root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD) between adjacent normal heartbeats significantly decreased. In the visual-motion cage rotating chair group, in addition to a reduction in the percentage of adjacent normal-to-normal intervals which differed by more than 50 ms (pNN50), as well as decreases in low-frequency power (LF), an increase in LF/HF was observed. …”
  3. 2503

    Table 1_Dietary retinoic acid improved the growth, lipid metabolism and immune status in Macrobrachium rosenbergii.docx by Qin-Cheng Huang (20944886)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to the prawns fed 4 mg/kg dietary RA, there was significantly lower lipid deposition in the muscle, hepatopancreas and whole body of prawns fed 296 mg/kg dietary RA. …”
  4. 2504

    Table 2_Dietary retinoic acid improved the growth, lipid metabolism and immune status in Macrobrachium rosenbergii.docx by Qin-Cheng Huang (20944886)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to the prawns fed 4 mg/kg dietary RA, there was significantly lower lipid deposition in the muscle, hepatopancreas and whole body of prawns fed 296 mg/kg dietary RA. …”
  5. 2505

    Image 2_Association of high consumption of soy products with the risk of cognitive impairment and major neurocognitive disorders: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysi... by Jialin Yu (131558)

    Published 2025
    “…Risk data showed no significant association with cognitive impairment. Dose-response data further explained an inverse relationship between dose and risk of cognitive impairment, with higher doses associated with lower risk.…”
  6. 2506

    Table 1_Association of high consumption of soy products with the risk of cognitive impairment and major neurocognitive disorders: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysi... by Jialin Yu (131558)

    Published 2025
    “…Risk data showed no significant association with cognitive impairment. Dose-response data further explained an inverse relationship between dose and risk of cognitive impairment, with higher doses associated with lower risk.…”
  7. 2507

    Image 1_Association of high consumption of soy products with the risk of cognitive impairment and major neurocognitive disorders: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysi... by Jialin Yu (131558)

    Published 2025
    “…Risk data showed no significant association with cognitive impairment. Dose-response data further explained an inverse relationship between dose and risk of cognitive impairment, with higher doses associated with lower risk.…”
  8. 2508

    Table 1_Linking the Planetary Health Diet Index to sarcopenia: the mediating effect of the non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (N... by Huan Chen (6545)

    Published 2025
    “…Analysis of the dose–response curve suggested a linear relationship between PHDI and sarcopenia. Furthermore, a significant positive association was identified between NHHR and sarcopenia [OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.16], with NHHR found to decrease as PHDI increased [beta coefficient (β) = −0.09, 95% CI: −0.11, −0.06]. …”
  9. 2509

    Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  10. 2510

    Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  11. 2511

    Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  12. 2512

    Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  13. 2513

    Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  14. 2514

    Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  15. 2515

    Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  16. 2516

    Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  17. 2517

    Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  18. 2518

    Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  19. 2519

    Table 2_Improved quality of life in head and neck cancer patients treated with modern arc radiotherapy techniques – A prospective longitudinal analysis.docx by Eva Yu-Hsuan Chuang (19724116)

    Published 2024
    “…Patients who received chemotherapy had significantly lower global QoL scales (mean difference, 27.94; 95% CI, 9.33-46.55; p=0.005). …”
  20. 2520

    Table 1_Improved quality of life in head and neck cancer patients treated with modern arc radiotherapy techniques – A prospective longitudinal analysis.docx by Eva Yu-Hsuan Chuang (19724116)

    Published 2024
    “…Patients who received chemotherapy had significantly lower global QoL scales (mean difference, 27.94; 95% CI, 9.33-46.55; p=0.005). …”