C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

BiFormer structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

GSConv module structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Performance comparison of three loss functions. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

mAP0.5 Curves of various models. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Network loss function change diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Comparative diagrams of different indicators. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Geometric model of the binocular system. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Enhanced dataset sample images. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Evaluation of chronic <i>in vivo</i> efficacy in 21 days rat MCT model in prevention mode. by Tobias G. Schips (21799838)

The incidence of grooming is most influenced by the addition of an opaque divider, as compared to manipulanda. by Matthew D. Boulanger (22600966)

Baseline analysis, nominal factors. by Hiroaki Yoshikawa (4615801)

“…Conversely, the occurrence of myasthenic crisis and current MG-ADL scores were lower in 2018. Regarding treatment, the utilization of tacrolimus, plasma exchange (PE), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) significantly increased between 2006 and 2018. …”

Minimal dataset for the study. by Hiroaki Yoshikawa (4615801)

“…Conversely, the occurrence of myasthenic crisis and current MG-ADL scores were lower in 2018. Regarding treatment, the utilization of tacrolimus, plasma exchange (PE), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) significantly increased between 2006 and 2018. …”

Baseline analysis, continuous factors. by Hiroaki Yoshikawa (4615801)

“…Conversely, the occurrence of myasthenic crisis and current MG-ADL scores were lower in 2018. Regarding treatment, the utilization of tacrolimus, plasma exchange (PE), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) significantly increased between 2006 and 2018. …”

Multivariable analysis between 2006 and 2018. by Hiroaki Yoshikawa (4615801)

“…Conversely, the occurrence of myasthenic crisis and current MG-ADL scores were lower in 2018. Regarding treatment, the utilization of tacrolimus, plasma exchange (PE), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) significantly increased between 2006 and 2018. …”

Accuracy on the ERAM task. by Daisung Jang (16781451)

“…However, coefficients for estrogen were significant for both emotion recognition tasks. Higher within-person levels of estrogen predicted lower accuracy, whereas higher between-person estrogen levels predicted greater accuracy. …”