Showing 1,721 - 1,740 results of 4,140 for search 'significantly ((((((lower decrease) OR (teer decrease))) OR (nn decrease))) OR (larger decrease))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 1721

    Experimental procedures. by Ellen Chan (22177558)

    Published 2025
    “…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
  2. 1722

    Supplementary file of datasets. by Ellen Chan (22177558)

    Published 2025
    “…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
  3. 1723
  4. 1724
  5. 1725

    Risk of bias summary. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

    Published 2025
    “…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
  6. 1726

    Criteria for study selection. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

    Published 2025
    “…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
  7. 1727
  8. 1728
  9. 1729

    Sociodemographic data of the sample. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  10. 1730

    Flowchart of the study. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  11. 1731

    Bandages: KT (3A) and RT (3B). by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  12. 1732

    ANOVA repeated measures of the variables. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  13. 1733

    Dataset. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  14. 1734

    CONSORT Flow Diagram. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  15. 1735
  16. 1736
  17. 1737
  18. 1738
  19. 1739
  20. 1740