Reference dataset. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

“…The attenuation profile also demonstrated high linearity (R² >0.95) and lower RMSE across all material concentrations, even in the presence of aluminium and steel. …”

Dataset with aluminium insert. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

“…The attenuation profile also demonstrated high linearity (R² >0.95) and lower RMSE across all material concentrations, even in the presence of aluminium and steel. …”

Data Sheet 1_Statistics and behavior of clinically significant extra-pulmonary vein atrial fibrillation sources: machine-learning-enhanced electrographic flow mapping in persistent... by Peter Ruppersberg (22123543)

“…Notably, the majority of significant sources were not continuously active; however, when these sources switched “ON,” the spatial variability of AF cycle lengths in the respective atrium decreased by more than 50%, suggesting an entraining effect.…”

The effects of cannabinoid receptor antagonists against neuroprotective effects of compound 4f in KA-treated mice. by Naoto Arimura (416442)

Participant demographics. by Anita B. Frohlich (20660615)

“…We found that paced nostril breathing both decreased alpha/mu oscillations over central and parietal areas and increased frontal midline and occipital theta oscillations when comparing to spontaneous breathing. …”

Theta power for frontal midline ROI. by Anita B. Frohlich (20660615)

“…We found that paced nostril breathing both decreased alpha/mu oscillations over central and parietal areas and increased frontal midline and occipital theta oscillations when comparing to spontaneous breathing. …”

Variables name and variable measurement. by Jinyuan Li (5927267)

“…Using the medical insurance records from 2017 to 2022, we evaluated the impact of the DRG system on medical costs, service efficiency and healthcare quality.…”

Comparison within groups. by Neng Pan (5262032)

Correlation diagram of each parameter in each group. by Neng Pan (5262032)

Descriptive statistics and variable definitions. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

The results of endogenous analysis. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

Correlation test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

S1 Dataset - by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

The mediation of confidence. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

Robustness test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

The effects of consumption inequality on SWB. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

The raw data for Fig 4. by Hongjoo An (21703199)

“…Luciferase assay and human and mouse brain multi-omics data show that, during the differentiation of OL precursor cells (OPCs) into OLs, the enhancer activity of Sox10-E1 does not change while that of Sox10-E2 decreases significantly. Chromatin interaction data indicate that the two <i>Sox10</i> enhancers lie close to the border of the <i>Sox10</i> topologically associating domain (TAD). …”

The raw data for S2 Fig. by Hongjoo An (21703199)

“…Luciferase assay and human and mouse brain multi-omics data show that, during the differentiation of OL precursor cells (OPCs) into OLs, the enhancer activity of Sox10-E1 does not change while that of Sox10-E2 decreases significantly. Chromatin interaction data indicate that the two <i>Sox10</i> enhancers lie close to the border of the <i>Sox10</i> topologically associating domain (TAD). …”

The raw data for Fig 6. by Hongjoo An (21703199)

“…Luciferase assay and human and mouse brain multi-omics data show that, during the differentiation of OL precursor cells (OPCs) into OLs, the enhancer activity of Sox10-E1 does not change while that of Sox10-E2 decreases significantly. Chromatin interaction data indicate that the two <i>Sox10</i> enhancers lie close to the border of the <i>Sox10</i> topologically associating domain (TAD). …”

The raw data for S4 Fig. by Hongjoo An (21703199)

“…Luciferase assay and human and mouse brain multi-omics data show that, during the differentiation of OL precursor cells (OPCs) into OLs, the enhancer activity of Sox10-E1 does not change while that of Sox10-E2 decreases significantly. Chromatin interaction data indicate that the two <i>Sox10</i> enhancers lie close to the border of the <i>Sox10</i> topologically associating domain (TAD). …”