Showing 2,781 - 2,800 results of 9,300 for search 'significantly ((((((lower decrease) OR (we decrease))) OR (linear decrease))) OR (teer decrease))', query time: 0.43s Refine Results
  1. 2781

    Demographic data. by Narisa Rattanalert (21445983)

    Published 2025
    “…Mean rubric scores indicative of LIO-ROP skills significantly improved from 2.94 to 3.59 out of 4 (P < 0.001), and the time required for the laser procedure decreased from 17.19 to 15.14 minutes in pre- and post-LIO-ROP practice, respectively. …”
  2. 2782

    Raw data. by Camilla Albano (16446679)

    Published 2025
    “…Conversely, silencing FASN or applying FASN inhibitors (<i>i.e</i>., CMS121 and C75) markedly reduces the infectivity of newly released HSV-1 virions, suggesting that, while initial replication remains unaffected, FASN is crucial for maintaining virion structure and facilitating entry into host cells. Additionally, we show that a source of lipid-rich external factors provided by fetal bovine serum significantly increases HSV-1 infectivity. …”
  3. 2783

    Data used to generate Fig 1. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  4. 2784

    Data used to generate Table 6. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  5. 2785

    Data used to generate Table 2. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  6. 2786

    Data used to generate Fig 3. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  7. 2787

    Data used to generate Fig 5. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  8. 2788

    Data used to generate Fig 2. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  9. 2789

    Data used to generate Fig 6. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  10. 2790

    Data used to generate Fig 4. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  11. 2791

    Data used to generate Table 5. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  12. 2792

    Data used to generate Table 3. by Pattamaporn Kittayapong (289542)

    Published 2025
    “…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  13. 2793
  14. 2794

    Changes in the neutrophil count. by Lu Yang (30847)

    Published 2025
    “…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
  15. 2795

    Changes in the platelet count. by Lu Yang (30847)

    Published 2025
    “…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
  16. 2796

    Changes in the white blood cell count. by Lu Yang (30847)

    Published 2025
    “…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
  17. 2797

    Changes in the hemoglobin. by Lu Yang (30847)

    Published 2025
    “…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
  18. 2798

    WBC and ANC on day 7 post-chemotherapy. by Lu Yang (30847)

    Published 2025
    “…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
  19. 2799

    General clinical data of 88 patients with NPC. by Lu Yang (30847)

    Published 2025
    “…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
  20. 2800

    CONSORT participant flow diagram. by Lu Yang (30847)

    Published 2025
    “…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”