Search alternatives:
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
3841
Data used to generate Fig 1.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3842
Data used to generate Table 6.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3843
Data used to generate Table 2.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3844
Data used to generate Fig 3.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3845
Data used to generate Fig 5.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3846
Data used to generate Fig 2.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3847
Data used to generate Fig 6.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3848
Data used to generate Fig 4.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3849
Data used to generate Table 5.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3850
Data used to generate Table 3.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3851
-
3852
-
3853
Changes in the neutrophil count.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
-
3854
Changes in the platelet count.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
-
3855
Changes in the white blood cell count.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
-
3856
Changes in the hemoglobin.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
-
3857
WBC and ANC on day 7 post-chemotherapy.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
-
3858
General clinical data of 88 patients with NPC.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
-
3859
CONSORT participant flow diagram.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
-
3860
S4 File -
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”