Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
2101
S1 Graphical abstract -
Published 2024“…Eventually we concluded that muddy fertilizer water irrigation exacerbated the clogging of dripper. …”
-
2102
Photograph of drip irrigation tape.
Published 2024“…Eventually we concluded that muddy fertilizer water irrigation exacerbated the clogging of dripper. …”
-
2103
-
2104
Rethinking the Role of AuNPs in Colorimetric Aptasensors: Dominant Nonspecific Interactions with Antibiotics over Aptamer Recognition
Published 2025“…Additionally, we found that the aptamers adsorbed on AuNPs could not be desorbed via specific target-aptamer binding, as the aptamer’s affinity was significantly reduced due to the adsorption. …”
-
2105
Rethinking the Role of AuNPs in Colorimetric Aptasensors: Dominant Nonspecific Interactions with Antibiotics over Aptamer Recognition
Published 2025“…Additionally, we found that the aptamers adsorbed on AuNPs could not be desorbed via specific target-aptamer binding, as the aptamer’s affinity was significantly reduced due to the adsorption. …”
-
2106
-
2107
Regulation of Rice Grain Weight by Fatty Acid Composition: Unveiling the Mechanistic Roles of <i>OsLIN6</i> by OsARF12
Published 2024“…Compared with the wild type (WT), the <i>OsLIN6</i> knockout mutant exhibited a lower grain weight, an increased C18:1 content, and a decreased C18:2 content. …”
-
2108
-
2109
Enhanced Reaction Kinetics in Stationary Two-Phase Flow through Porous Media
Published 2025“…The global kinetics initially increase before experiencing a monotonic decrease with significant fluctuations caused by the displacement of the nonwetting phase. …”
-
2110
Enhanced Reaction Kinetics in Stationary Two-Phase Flow through Porous Media
Published 2025“…The global kinetics initially increase before experiencing a monotonic decrease with significant fluctuations caused by the displacement of the nonwetting phase. …”
-
2111
Enhanced Reaction Kinetics in Stationary Two-Phase Flow through Porous Media
Published 2025“…The global kinetics initially increase before experiencing a monotonic decrease with significant fluctuations caused by the displacement of the nonwetting phase. …”
-
2112
Enhanced Reaction Kinetics in Stationary Two-Phase Flow through Porous Media
Published 2025“…The global kinetics initially increase before experiencing a monotonic decrease with significant fluctuations caused by the displacement of the nonwetting phase. …”
-
2113
Enhanced Reaction Kinetics in Stationary Two-Phase Flow through Porous Media
Published 2025“…The global kinetics initially increase before experiencing a monotonic decrease with significant fluctuations caused by the displacement of the nonwetting phase. …”
-
2114
Enhanced Reaction Kinetics in Stationary Two-Phase Flow through Porous Media
Published 2025“…The global kinetics initially increase before experiencing a monotonic decrease with significant fluctuations caused by the displacement of the nonwetting phase. …”
-
2115
Enhanced Reaction Kinetics in Stationary Two-Phase Flow through Porous Media
Published 2025“…The global kinetics initially increase before experiencing a monotonic decrease with significant fluctuations caused by the displacement of the nonwetting phase. …”
-
2116
-
2117
CONSORT diagram.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2118
Raw data.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2119
Postoperative outcomes.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2120
Postoperative complications.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”