Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
2081
-
2082
-
2083
-
2084
-
2085
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
2086
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
2087
Supplementary file of datasets.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
2088
Summary statistics of key variables.
Published 2024“…Our results suggest the importance of addressing urban agglomeration costs as a means to facilitate innovative activity.</p></div>…”
-
2089
Functional and strength parameters.
Published 2025“…An overall tendency to an increase in FF and a decrease in functional measures were observed over 2 years. …”
-
2090
-
2091
Adverse event list.
Published 2025“…No statistically significant improvements were seen in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (mean decrease −0.73; 95% CI; −2.1, 0.62; <i>p</i> = 0.255), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (mean increase 0.09; 95% CI; −2.6, 2.8; <i>p</i> > 0.999), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (mean decrease −1.27; 95% CI; −3.8, 1.3; <i>p</i> = 0.257), and the Starkstein Apathy Scale (mean increase 0.36; 95% CI; −1.6, 2.4; <i>p</i> = 0.822). …”
-
2092
Patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…No statistically significant improvements were seen in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (mean decrease −0.73; 95% CI; −2.1, 0.62; <i>p</i> = 0.255), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (mean increase 0.09; 95% CI; −2.6, 2.8; <i>p</i> > 0.999), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (mean decrease −1.27; 95% CI; −3.8, 1.3; <i>p</i> = 0.257), and the Starkstein Apathy Scale (mean increase 0.36; 95% CI; −1.6, 2.4; <i>p</i> = 0.822). …”
-
2093
-
2094
-
2095
-
2096
Changes in the active H3K27ac and repressive H3K27me3 histone marks among Vasa2+/Piwi1+ and all cells in fed, starved, and refed juvenile polyps.
Published 2025“…Between fed, T<sub>5ds</sub> and T<sub>20ds</sub> timepoints, MFI levels of H3K27ac progressively and significantly decreased while levels H3K27me3 (M) did not change significantly (N). …”
-
2097
Age-related correlation of PBMCs percentages in comparison between males and females.
Published 2024“…<p>Only cells/groups with significant p-values are shown. Additional data are presented in S1 Fig 5 in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0300946#pone.0300946.s001" target="_blank">S1 File</a>. …”
-
2098
-
2099
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
2100
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”