(a, b). The statistical error analyses for the models using the same dataset. by Fahd Saeed Alakbari (10701871)

Coal seam combustion (a), (c) and infrared thermometry map (b), (d) in Fire Zone 1 and 3 (Republished from Desheng Xie under a CC BY license, with permission from Desheng Xie, orig... by Desheng Xie (21439869)

The restoration effect carried out in the early stage of (a) Fire Zone 1 and (b) Fire Zone 3 (Republished from Desheng Xie under a CC BY license, with permission from Desheng Xie,... by Desheng Xie (21439869)

Structure diagram of ensemble model. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Fitting formula parameter table. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Test plan. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Fitting surface parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Model generalisation validation error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Empirical model prediction error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Fitting curve parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Test instrument. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Empirical model establishment process. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Model prediction error trend chart. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Basic physical parameters of red clay. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

BP neural network structure diagram. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Structure diagram of GBDT model. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Model prediction error analysis index. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Fitting curve parameter table. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Model prediction error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”

Effect of preplant treatments (a) and post-plant treatments (b) on anthracnose fruit rot (AFR) fruit biomass during the 2022/23 and 2023/24 growing seasons. by Baker D. Aljawasim (22765921)