Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
2721
Data used to generate Fig 5.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
2722
Data used to generate Fig 2.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
2723
Data used to generate Fig 6.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
2724
Data used to generate Fig 4.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
2725
Data used to generate Table 5.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
2726
Data used to generate Table 3.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
2727
Univariate linear regression analysis of scales.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Objective</p><p>Body image perception significantly impacts university students’ well-being and potentially their creativity. …”
-
2728
-
2729
Multiple comparisons after ANOVA(CR10).
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
2730
Homogeneity test of CR10.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
2731
Illustration of the fNIRS device worn.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
2732
Analysis of variance of HbO<sub>2</sub> in bilateral PFC.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
2733
fNIRS equipment coordinates.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
2734
Changes of muscle oxygen saturation.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
2735
Analysis of variance of CR10.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
2736
Placement on the forehead.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
2737
IMW intervention plan design.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
2738
-
2739
-
2740
Risk of bias across 22 included studie.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (n = 3,463) showed that ketamine/esketamine significantly decreased PPD risk at 1- (risk ratio [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3–0.57) and 4–6-week (RR, 0.47; 95%CI, 0.35–0.63) follow-ups. …”