Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
1581
Fitting surface parameters.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1582
Model generalisation validation error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1583
Empirical model prediction error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1584
Fitting curve parameters.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1585
Test instrument.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1586
Empirical model establishment process.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1587
Model prediction error trend chart.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1588
Basic physical parameters of red clay.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1589
BP neural network structure diagram.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1590
Structure diagram of GBDT model.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1591
Model prediction error analysis index.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1592
Fitting curve parameter table.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1593
Model prediction error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1594
-
1595
Equivalent effect model.
Published 2025“…The number of soil disturbance particles decreases with an increase in forward speed, increases with a larger radius of the convex structure, and slightly decreases with an increase in the lugs angle. …”
-
1596
Simulation model.
Published 2025“…The number of soil disturbance particles decreases with an increase in forward speed, increases with a larger radius of the convex structure, and slightly decreases with an increase in the lugs angle. …”
-
1597
Displacement of soil particles in z direction.
Published 2025“…The number of soil disturbance particles decreases with an increase in forward speed, increases with a larger radius of the convex structure, and slightly decreases with an increase in the lugs angle. …”
-
1598
Simulation parameters [13].
Published 2025“…The number of soil disturbance particles decreases with an increase in forward speed, increases with a larger radius of the convex structure, and slightly decreases with an increase in the lugs angle. …”
-
1599
Displacement of soil particles in x direction.
Published 2025“…The number of soil disturbance particles decreases with an increase in forward speed, increases with a larger radius of the convex structure, and slightly decreases with an increase in the lugs angle. …”
-
1600
Soil particle simulation model.
Published 2025“…The number of soil disturbance particles decreases with an increase in forward speed, increases with a larger radius of the convex structure, and slightly decreases with an increase in the lugs angle. …”