Showing 3,761 - 3,780 results of 5,273 for search 'significantly ((((((nn decrease) OR (linear decrease))) OR (mean decrease))) OR (greater decrease))', query time: 0.59s Refine Results
  1. 3761

    Data_.xlsx by Raja Bouguezzi (17915965)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, the asymmetry score exhibited a moderate decrease (∆46.96%, ES=0.64). In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the CG across all fitness measures. …”
  2. 3762

    Table 1_Sex-specific association between triglyceride-glucose index and all-cause mortality in patients with osteoporotic fractures: a retrospective cohort study.docx by Shao-han Guo (19690687)

    Published 2025
    “…However, in males, there was a non-linear correlation, where patients in the uppermost TyG-I tertile showed a substantially decreased mortality risk relative to those in the lowest tertile (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.30–0.92, p = 0.02). …”
  3. 3763

    Supplementary file 1_Sex-specific association between triglyceride-glucose index and all-cause mortality in patients with osteoporotic fractures: a retrospective cohort study.xlsx by Shao-han Guo (19690687)

    Published 2025
    “…However, in males, there was a non-linear correlation, where patients in the uppermost TyG-I tertile showed a substantially decreased mortality risk relative to those in the lowest tertile (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.30–0.92, p = 0.02). …”
  4. 3764

    eIF3d1 phosphorylation but not cap-binding is required for CySC self-renewal. by Ruoxu Wang (9312306)

    Published 2025
    “…(<b>B</b>) Number of Zfh1<sup>+</sup> Eya<sup>−</sup> CySCs in testes in which wild-type (eIF3d1<sup>WT</sup>), phospho-mimetic (eIF3d1<sup>DD</sup>) or phospho-dead (eIF3d1<sup>NN</sup>) eIF3d1 was over-expressed. Phospho-dead eIF3d1 expression results in a significant decrease in CySC numbers (<i>N</i> ≥ 18 testes, * <i>P</i> < 0.05, ns <i>P</i> = 0.1150 (eIF3d1<sup>WT</sup>) or <i>P</i> > 0.9999 (eIF3d1<sup>DD</sup>), Kruskal-Wallis test). …”
  5. 3765

    Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  6. 3766

    Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  7. 3767

    Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  8. 3768

    Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  9. 3769

    Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  10. 3770

    Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  11. 3771

    Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  12. 3772

    Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  13. 3773

    Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  14. 3774

    Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  15. 3775

    DATA ALL PARTICIPANTS.xlsx by Angela Van Sickle (20441450)

    Published 2024
    “…Across all ages, males completed fewer swallows, displayed greater average volumes per swallow, required significantly less time, and exhibited significantly less area under the curve when compared to females. …”
  16. 3776

    Data Sheet 1_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  17. 3777

    Table 3_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  18. 3778

    Table 4_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  19. 3779

    Data Sheet 1_Association between the systemic immune-inflammatory index and the immune response after hepatitis B vaccination: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES data.docx by Jiayan Hu (18593615)

    Published 2025
    “…Notably, antibody expression significantly decreased as the SII increased beyond the threshold of 448.3.…”
  20. 3780

    Data Sheet 2_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”