Showing 6,041 - 6,060 results of 18,335 for search 'significantly ((((((step decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (a decrease))) OR (observed decrease))', query time: 0.79s Refine Results
  1. 6041

    ANOM analysis of evaluated criteria K1–K5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    “…The presented research works with five criteria, identified by the Institute for Economic and Social Reforms, and aims to quantify the agreement of the results of the assessment of the financial health of territorial self-government entities in 2020 using the TOPSIS technique with a gradually decreasing number of criteria. For this purpose, a total of 26 combinations of criteria are created, with the number of 5, 4, 3 and 2 used criteria, the importance of which is determined based on their absolute variability using the standard deviation method. …”
  2. 6042
  3. 6043
  4. 6044
  5. 6045

    Adult <i>Shroom3</i><sup><i>+</i></sup><sup><i>/Gt</i></sup> mouse hearts show left ventricular thinning. by Jennifer L. Carleton (22208916)

    Published 2025
    “…C) Quantification of the thickness of the compact layers of 3-month-old hearts showed a significant decrease in left ventricle wall thickness in the heterozygous mice (P < 0.0001) when compared to the wild-type. …”
  6. 6046
  7. 6047
  8. 6048
  9. 6049
  10. 6050
  11. 6051
  12. 6052

    Regression results of the Callaway method. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  13. 6053

    Regression results of crowding out effects. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  14. 6054

    Article data. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  15. 6055

    Overidentification test results. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  16. 6056

    Quantile regression results. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  17. 6057

    Instrumental variable regression results. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  18. 6058

    Other robust regression results. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  19. 6059

    Baseline regression results. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
  20. 6060

    Results of propensity score matching. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”