Showing 401 - 420 results of 18,449 for search 'significantly ((((((step decrease) OR (we decrease))) OR (a decrease))) OR (observed decrease))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 401
  2. 402
  3. 403
  4. 404
  5. 405
  6. 406

    Flowchart of patient selection in this study. by Kazuyoshi Ohkawa (836847)

    Published 2024
    “…Among the letrozole-treated patients, the mean FIB-4 index tended to decline during letrozole treatment; a significant decrease was observed at 18 and 24 months compared with the baseline values (p = 0.044 and p = 0.013). …”
  7. 407

    S1 Data - by Kazuyoshi Ohkawa (836847)

    Published 2024
    “…Among the letrozole-treated patients, the mean FIB-4 index tended to decline during letrozole treatment; a significant decrease was observed at 18 and 24 months compared with the baseline values (p = 0.044 and p = 0.013). …”
  8. 408

    Data for the G7 countries in 2022. by Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana (14659817)

    Published 2024
    “…The results indicate that only France displays a significant negative trend and thus a continuous decrease in the level of alcohol consumption. …”
  9. 409

    Time series plots: Alcohol consumption. by Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana (14659817)

    Published 2024
    “…The results indicate that only France displays a significant negative trend and thus a continuous decrease in the level of alcohol consumption. …”
  10. 410
  11. 411

    Experimental setup. by Shinnosuke Hase (20917896)

    Published 2025
    “…Conversely, the fast-rhythm auditory guide significantly increased step rate and decreased step length (p <  0.05). …”
  12. 412

    <i>Aedes aegypti</i> database from SAGO traps. by Jesús A. Aguilar-Durán (9931967)

    Published 2025
    “…IVM treatment reduced the number of females per trap per week from 3.29 ± 0.24 to 2.41 ± 0.20 (33.7% reduction), AGO from 1.58 ± 0.17 to 0.25 ± 0.05 (85.2% reduction), and AGO + IVM from 1.49 ± 0.17 to 0.53 ± 0.08 (67.78% reduction), based on Henderson’s formula. We observed a non-significant increase in the control area (no treatment provided) in the mosquito populations, increasing from 2.94 ± 0.24 in the pretreatment period to 3.25 ± 0.28 of the post treatment period.…”
  13. 413

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  14. 414

    The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  15. 415

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  16. 416

    List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  17. 417
  18. 418
  19. 419
  20. 420