Showing 11,081 - 11,100 results of 18,442 for search 'significantly ((((((teer decrease) OR (linear decrease))) OR (a decrease))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.70s Refine Results
  1. 11081

    Footprints of Pr77<sup>Gag</sup> on the WT structure model. by Suresha G. Prabhu (19797666)

    Published 2024
    “…All nucleotides that show a reactivity decrease >40% upon Gag addition, also show statistically significant difference according to the Mann–Whitney non parametrical U test (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  2. 11082

    Balance test results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  3. 11083

    Mechanism analysis results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  4. 11084

    Endogenous test results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  5. 11085

    Heterogeneity analysis results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  6. 11086

    Robustness test results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  7. 11087

    Baseline results of the impact of RLM on HWSW. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  8. 11088

    The influencing factors of RLM. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  9. 11089

    Variable definitions and basic statistics. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  10. 11090

    Average and marginal effects of RLM on HWSW. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  11. 11091

    Thermal supply for each thermal supply unit. by Jingjing Ma (419752)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
  12. 11092

    The OCPP-P2G-CHP coupling relationship. by Jingjing Ma (419752)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
  13. 11093

    The provision of energy for carbon capture. by Jingjing Ma (419752)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
  14. 11094

    39-20-6 Integrated Energy System. by Jingjing Ma (419752)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
  15. 11095

    Power supply for each power supply unit. by Jingjing Ma (419752)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
  16. 11096

    Overall view of the slurry. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  17. 11097

    Definitions of variables. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  18. 11098

    Realistic structure diagram of testing equipment. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  19. 11099

    Engineering geological cross section diagram. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  20. 11100

    The equipped sensors on steel pipes. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”