Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
6841
Direct Observation of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation and Core–Shell Morphology of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Collected from Three Northeast Asian Cities and Implications for N<sub>2</sub>O<s...
Published 2025“…As the shell becomes more viscous, the diffusivity of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> decreases, thereby lowering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake coefficient by 1–3 orders of magnitude and significantly restricting N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake. …”
-
6842
Direct Observation of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation and Core–Shell Morphology of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Collected from Three Northeast Asian Cities and Implications for N<sub>2</sub>O<s...
Published 2025“…As the shell becomes more viscous, the diffusivity of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> decreases, thereby lowering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake coefficient by 1–3 orders of magnitude and significantly restricting N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake. …”
-
6843
Direct Observation of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation and Core–Shell Morphology of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Collected from Three Northeast Asian Cities and Implications for N<sub>2</sub>O<s...
Published 2025“…As the shell becomes more viscous, the diffusivity of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> decreases, thereby lowering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake coefficient by 1–3 orders of magnitude and significantly restricting N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake. …”
-
6844
Direct Observation of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation and Core–Shell Morphology of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Collected from Three Northeast Asian Cities and Implications for N<sub>2</sub>O<s...
Published 2025“…As the shell becomes more viscous, the diffusivity of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> decreases, thereby lowering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake coefficient by 1–3 orders of magnitude and significantly restricting N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake. …”
-
6845
Direct Observation of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation and Core–Shell Morphology of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Collected from Three Northeast Asian Cities and Implications for N<sub>2</sub>O<s...
Published 2025“…As the shell becomes more viscous, the diffusivity of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> decreases, thereby lowering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake coefficient by 1–3 orders of magnitude and significantly restricting N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake. …”
-
6846
-
6847
Prediction of transition readiness.
Published 2025“…In most transition domains, help needed did not decrease with age and was not affected by function. …”
-
6848
Dataset visualization diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6849
Dataset sample images.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6850
Performance comparison of different models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6851
C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6852
YOLOv8n detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6853
YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6854
BiFormer structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6855
YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6856
GSConv module structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6857
Performance comparison of three loss functions.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6858
mAP0.5 Curves of various models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6859
Network loss function change diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6860
Comparative diagrams of different indicators.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”