Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
781
-
782
-
783
-
784
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
785
Mineral content of raw materials.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
786
Technical parameters of ultrafine cement.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
787
Technical parameters of PVA fiber.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
788
Sample preparation and testing flow chart.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
789
XRD patterns of MUCG at different curing age.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
790
FTIR spectra of MUCG at different curing age.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
791
Description of fitting models.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
792
Mineral composition of UFC, B, and SF.
Published 2024“…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
-
793
-
794
High Stability, Piezoelectric Response, and Promising Photocatalytic Activity on the New Pentagonal CGeP<sub>4</sub> Monolayer
Published 2024“…Under compressive strain, the band gap decreases almost linearly to 2.65 eV at −8% strain and then drops sharply to 0.97 eV, an ∼69% variation. …”
-
795
High Stability, Piezoelectric Response, and Promising Photocatalytic Activity on the New Pentagonal CGeP<sub>4</sub> Monolayer
Published 2024“…Under compressive strain, the band gap decreases almost linearly to 2.65 eV at −8% strain and then drops sharply to 0.97 eV, an ∼69% variation. …”
-
796
Baseline characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>After DRG implementation, the logarithmic mean of total hospitalization expenditures decreased significantly (3.914 ± 0.837 vs. 3.872 ± 1.004), while rates of unplanned readmissions, unplanned reoperations, postoperative complications, and patient complaints within 30 days increased significantly (3.784% vs 4.214%, 0.083% vs 0.166%, 0.207% vs 0.258%, 3.741% vs 5.133%). …”
-
797
The framework diagram of this study.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>After DRG implementation, the logarithmic mean of total hospitalization expenditures decreased significantly (3.914 ± 0.837 vs. 3.872 ± 1.004), while rates of unplanned readmissions, unplanned reoperations, postoperative complications, and patient complaints within 30 days increased significantly (3.784% vs 4.214%, 0.083% vs 0.166%, 0.207% vs 0.258%, 3.741% vs 5.133%). …”
-
798
-
799
-
800