Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
901
-
902
-
903
-
904
-
905
-
906
Comparison of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in Millimeters as a Function of Kernel Size.
Published 2025“…<p>Fig 8 presents the mean absolute error (MAE) in millimeters as a function of kernel size (in pixels) for two model configurations. …”
-
907
Behaviour and significance of reservoir evaporation and seepage losses – an experience of four reservoirs in Damodar River Valley, India
Published 2025“…Annual seepage loss and its mean rate increased gradually for a considerable period during initial operation stage; later, both decreased and stabilized. …”
-
908
Effect of busulfan treatment on androgens and androgen receptors.
Published 2025“…The androgen concentration remains stable after busulfan treatment, but the androgen receptor concentration significantly decreases 21 days after treatment. Values are presented as means ± standard deviations; n = 3 per group. * <i>p</i> < 0.05, ** <i>p</i> < 0.01.…”
-
909
Key safety measures including adverse events.
Published 2025“…Waist circumference (mean change (MC) −2.23 cm; 95% CI [−3.98, −0.49]; <i>p</i> = 0.01), BMI (MC −0.49 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; 95% CI [−0.88, −0.10[; <i>p</i> = 0.01), and android fat mass measured by DXA (MC −167 g; 95% CI [−264, −71[; <i>p</i> < 0.001) decreased in the COCP group over the study period whilst there was no statistically significant changes in these parameters in the metformin only group when compared to baseline.. …”
-
910
-
911
-
912
-
913
-
914
-
915
-
916
-
917
-
918
-
919
-
920
Data.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”