Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
3021
Data used to generate Table 2.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3022
Data used to generate Fig 3.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3023
Data used to generate Fig 5.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3024
Data used to generate Fig 2.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3025
Data used to generate Fig 6.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3026
Data used to generate Fig 4.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3027
Data used to generate Table 5.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3028
Data used to generate Table 3.
Published 2025“…Our results showed that an irradiation dose of 7 Gy significantly caused more than 90% sterility in both wild-type males and females (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3029
-
3030
Multiple comparisons after ANOVA(CR10).
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
3031
Homogeneity test of CR10.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
3032
Illustration of the fNIRS device worn.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
3033
Analysis of variance of HbO<sub>2</sub> in bilateral PFC.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
3034
fNIRS equipment coordinates.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
3035
Changes of muscle oxygen saturation.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
3036
Analysis of variance of CR10.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
3037
Placement on the forehead.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
3038
IMW intervention plan design.
Published 2025“…Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly decreased HbO₂ in both the IMW (<i>p</i> = 0.019) and placebo (<i>p</i> = 0.035) groups relative to blank controls. …”
-
3039
-
3040