Image_1_Dietary soy protein reverses obesity-induced liver steatosis and alters fecal microbial composition independent of isoflavone level.JPEG by Reza Hakkak (11086)

“…HIF) did not affect any of these measurements except in the SPC-HIF group, which had an additional decrease in liver weight (p < 0.05) compared to the SPC-LIF group. …”

Table_1_Dietary soy protein reverses obesity-induced liver steatosis and alters fecal microbial composition independent of isoflavone level.DOCX by Reza Hakkak (11086)

“…HIF) did not affect any of these measurements except in the SPC-HIF group, which had an additional decrease in liver weight (p < 0.05) compared to the SPC-LIF group. …”

Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”

Table 1_Associations of specific food sources of dietary fat with prostate cancer incidence and mortality: results from a large prospective cohort.docx by Yong-xin Fu (22644743)

“…However, a greater intake of plant-based monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs; HR _Q4vs.Q1: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.48–0.94; P_trend = 0.023), plant-based SFAs (HR _Q4vs.Q1:0.65; 95% CI: 0.47–0.91; P_trend = 0.026) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) from fish (HR _Q4vs.Q1: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.48–0.87; P_trend = 0.005) was associated with a decreased PCa mortality in a non-linear dose-response relationships (all P_{non − linearity} < 0.05). …”

Droperidol is associated with reduced length of stay in the treatment of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome by Geoffrey S. Kelly (21537766)

“…After adjustments, droperidol use was associated with a reduced length of stay (mean ratio 0.76; 95% CI: 0.62 0.94; <i>P</i> = 0.01), decreased total medication administration (OR 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20–0.58; <i>P <</i>0.001) and decreased usage of opioids (OR 0.16; 95% CI: 0.07–0.39; <i>P <</i>0.001). …”

Strategy parameters across development for female mice in set size = 2 and set size = 4 from winning computational model. by Juliana Chase (20469427)

“…However, female mice had a significant decrease in parameter S1 “Inappropriate Lose-Shift” in set size = 4 (H: <i>p</i> = 0.04) with a trend in a similar direction in set size = 2 (C: <i>p</i> = 0.08).…”

Data Sheet 1_Unveiling spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of ecosystem service value: interpretable HGB-SHAP machine learning model.docx by Xiangming Xu (420946)

“…In contrast, the soil organic matter (SOC) demonstrated a non-linear, highly significant positive correlation with ESV.…”

Image 1_SQLE-mediated squalene metabolism promotes tumor immune evasion in pancreatic cancer.tif by Junchen Pan (19417598)

“…RT-PCR and Western blot analyses were used to investigate the relevant molecular mechanisms.</p>Results<p>We show that SQLE is significantly overexpressed in pancreatic cancer, and abrogation of SQLE results in a significant increase in squalene accumulation within tumor cells. …”

Data Sheet 1_Shifts in soil microbial and nematode communities over progression of pine wilt disease occurring in Pinus koraiensis stands.pdf by Siyu Tian (9874001)

“…Consequently, we observed a lower inter-kingdom network complexity in the soil community of the pines following the PWD, in which the bacterial networks decreased but fungal networks increased in complexity. …”

Data Sheet 1_Comparison of the gut microbiota in older people with and without sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.zip by Yanqing Ren (2080156)

“…Weighted standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for α-diversity index were estimated using a random effects model. …”

Upper extremity orthopedic softball injuries presenting to the emergency department: epidemiology across the lifespan by David F. Painter (12884672)

“…The average incidence rate of UE injuries from 2012–2021 was 187.9 per 100,000 persons, with a significant decrease in injury incidence across the timespan (<i>p</i> < .001). …”