Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
2821
Table 3_Time trends in mortality of congenital heart disease in children aged 0–14 years: a global, regional, and national cohort analysis from 1990 to 2021 using the global burden...
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>This study utilized the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database to examine trends in CHD-related mortality among children aged 0-14 from 1990 to 2021.</p>Results<p>We report a 55.34% reduction in CHD-related deaths among children, with global mortality rates decreasing from 28.63 per 100,000 in 1990 to 11.06 per 100,000 in 2021. …”
-
2822
Image 2_Time trends in mortality of congenital heart disease in children aged 0–14 years: a global, regional, and national cohort analysis from 1990 to 2021 using the global burden...
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>This study utilized the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database to examine trends in CHD-related mortality among children aged 0-14 from 1990 to 2021.</p>Results<p>We report a 55.34% reduction in CHD-related deaths among children, with global mortality rates decreasing from 28.63 per 100,000 in 1990 to 11.06 per 100,000 in 2021. …”
-
2823
Image_1_Dietary soy protein reverses obesity-induced liver steatosis and alters fecal microbial composition independent of isoflavone level.JPEG
Published 2024“…HIF) did not affect any of these measurements except in the SPC-HIF group, which had an additional decrease in liver weight (p < 0.05) compared to the SPC-LIF group. …”
-
2824
Table_1_Dietary soy protein reverses obesity-induced liver steatosis and alters fecal microbial composition independent of isoflavone level.DOCX
Published 2024“…HIF) did not affect any of these measurements except in the SPC-HIF group, which had an additional decrease in liver weight (p < 0.05) compared to the SPC-LIF group. …”
-
2825
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2826
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2827
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2828
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2829
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2830
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2831
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2832
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2833
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2834
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2835
Table 1_Associations of specific food sources of dietary fat with prostate cancer incidence and mortality: results from a large prospective cohort.docx
Published 2025“…However, a greater intake of plant-based monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs; HR <sub>Q4vs.Q1</sub>: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.48–0.94; P<sub>trend</sub> = 0.023), plant-based SFAs (HR <sub>Q4vs.Q1</sub>:0.65; 95% CI: 0.47–0.91; P<sub>trend</sub> = 0.026) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) from fish (HR <sub>Q4vs.Q1</sub>: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.48–0.87; P<sub>trend</sub> = 0.005) was associated with a decreased PCa mortality in a non-linear dose-response relationships (all P<sub>non − linearity</sub> < 0.05). …”
-
2836
Data Sheet 1_Cynaroside ameliorates TNBS-induced colitis by inhibiting intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis via the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway.pdf
Published 2025“…Combining network pharmacology prediction analysis with our validation data from animal models and colonic organoids, we demonstrated that Cyn significantly inhibits IEC apoptosis, as indicated by a decrease in the proportion of TUNEL-positive cells and changes in apoptosis-related protein levels. …”
-
2837
Strategy parameters across development for female mice in set size = 2 and set size = 4 from winning computational model.
Published 2024“…However, female mice had a significant decrease in parameter S1 “Inappropriate Lose-Shift” in set size = 4 (H: <i>p</i> = 0.04) with a trend in a similar direction in set size = 2 (C: <i>p</i> = 0.08).…”
-
2838
Data Sheet 1_Unveiling spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of ecosystem service value: interpretable HGB-SHAP machine learning model.docx
Published 2025“…In contrast, the soil organic matter (SOC) demonstrated a non-linear, highly significant positive correlation with ESV.…”
-
2839
Table 1_Impacts of surface wear of attachments on maxillary canine distalization with clear aligners: a three-dimensional finite element study.docx
Published 2025“…In the optimized root control attachment group, the greatest reduction was observed in M4–M6, and the efficiency of canine distalization decreased to less than 60% in response to M6.…”
-
2840
Image 1_SQLE-mediated squalene metabolism promotes tumor immune evasion in pancreatic cancer.tif
Published 2024“…RT-PCR and Western blot analyses were used to investigate the relevant molecular mechanisms.</p>Results<p>We show that SQLE is significantly overexpressed in pancreatic cancer, and abrogation of SQLE results in a significant increase in squalene accumulation within tumor cells. …”