Showing 2,501 - 2,520 results of 9,062 for search 'significantly ((((((we decrease) OR (larger decrease))) OR (mean decrease))) OR (nn decrease))', query time: 0.58s Refine Results
  1. 2501
  2. 2502
  3. 2503
  4. 2504
  5. 2505
  6. 2506
  7. 2507
  8. 2508
  9. 2509
  10. 2510
  11. 2511
  12. 2512
  13. 2513

    S1 File - by Ingmar Lundquist (46422)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, the significance of extracellular NO on GSIS was studied. …”
  14. 2514

    Relationships between clay and quartz content, TOC, 2D-NMR solid OM, S<sub>1</sub>, 2D-NMR light oil and fractal dimensions. by Changjun Ji (18285907)

    Published 2024
    “…This results in the formation of larger dissolution pores within the carbonated minerals [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0309346#pone.0309346.ref043" target="_blank">43</a>], leading to a decrease in the fractal dimensions D<sub>1</sub> and D<sub>2</sub>. …”
  15. 2515
  16. 2516
  17. 2517

    Addressing Imbalanced Classification Problems in Drug Discovery and Development Using Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, AutoGluon-Tabular, and H2O AutoML by Ayush Garg (21090944)

    Published 2025
    “…The important findings of our studies are as follows: (i) there is no effect of threshold optimization on ranking metrics such as AUC and AUPR, but AUC and AUPR get affected by class-weighting and SMOTTomek; (ii) for ML methods RF and SVM, significant percentage improvement up to 375, 33.33, and 450 over all the data sets can be achieved, respectively, for F1 score, MCC, and balanced accuracy, which are suitable for performance evaluation of imbalanced data sets; (iii) for AutoML libraries AutoGluon-Tabular and H2O AutoML, significant percentage improvement up to 383.33, 37.25, and 533.33 over all the data sets can be achieved, respectively, for F1 score, MCC, and balanced accuracy; (iv) the general pattern of percentage improvement in balanced accuracy is that the percentage improvement increases when the class ratio is systematically decreased from 0.5 to 0.1; in the case of F1 score and MCC, maximum improvement is achieved at the class ratio of 0.3; (v) for both ML and AutoML with balancing, it is observed that any individual class-balancing technique does not outperform all other methods on a significantly higher number of data sets based on F1 score; (vi) the three external balancing techniques combined outperformed the internal balancing methods of the ML and AutoML; (vii) AutoML tools perform as good as the ML models and in some cases perform even better for handling imbalanced classification when applied with imbalance handling techniques. …”
  18. 2518
  19. 2519
  20. 2520