Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
721
Flow chart.
Published 2025“…However, subgroup analyses revealed a significant rise in OASI among nulliparous women giving birth by spatula (Group 2b), and a clinically relevant but statistically nonsignificant rise among nulliparous women delivering by forceps (Group 2a), while the prevalence of episiotomy significantly decreased. …”
-
722
Behaviour and significance of reservoir evaporation and seepage losses – an experience of four reservoirs in Damodar River Valley, India
Published 2025“…While formulation of gauge-seepage model, best linear relation was between their log transformed values. …”
-
723
Table 2_Prognostic significance of collagen content in solitary fibrous tumors of the central nervous system.docx
Published 2024“…Purpose<p>We aimed to explore the prognostic significance of collagen content in solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) of the central nervous system (CNS) and preliminarily investigate its relationship with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of SFTs.…”
-
724
Table 4_Prognostic significance of collagen content in solitary fibrous tumors of the central nervous system.docx
Published 2024“…Purpose<p>We aimed to explore the prognostic significance of collagen content in solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) of the central nervous system (CNS) and preliminarily investigate its relationship with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of SFTs.…”
-
725
Table 3_Prognostic significance of collagen content in solitary fibrous tumors of the central nervous system.docx
Published 2024“…Purpose<p>We aimed to explore the prognostic significance of collagen content in solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) of the central nervous system (CNS) and preliminarily investigate its relationship with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of SFTs.…”
-
726
Table 1_Prognostic significance of collagen content in solitary fibrous tumors of the central nervous system.docx
Published 2024“…Purpose<p>We aimed to explore the prognostic significance of collagen content in solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) of the central nervous system (CNS) and preliminarily investigate its relationship with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of SFTs.…”
-
727
Cross-sectional dependence results.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
728
Autocorrelation test results.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
729
Pesaran’s CADF test results for Model I.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
730
Descriptive statistics of related variables.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
731
Quantitative analysis.
Published 2024“…ELISA results revealed that the levels of key inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-17 and IL-23) were significantly elevated in the LPS-treated model group (<i>P</i><0.0001, <i>P</i><0.001), but these levels were significantly decreased after NMRAL1 siRNA transfection (<i>P</i><0.0001, <i>P</i><0.01, <i>P</i><0.05).…”
-
732
The Vancouver Scar Scale.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
733
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
734
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
735
Mammary fistula (n(%)).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
736
Forest maps affecting lactation outcomes.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
737
Postoperative drainage(ml) (M(IQR)).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
738
Data.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
739
-
740
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”