Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
3461
Comparison of Model Five-classification Results.
Published 2025“…Experiments demonstrate that PCA-CGAN not only achieves stable convergence on a large-scale heterogeneous dataset comprising 43 patients for the first time but also resolves the “dilution effect” problem in data augmentation, avoiding the asymmetric phenomenon where Precision increases while Recall decreases. After data augmentation, the ResNet model’s average F1 score improved significantly, with particularly outstanding performance on rare categories such as atrial premature beats, far surpassing traditional methods like SigCWGAN and TD-GAN. …”
-
3462
PCAECG-GAN K-fold experiment table.
Published 2025“…Experiments demonstrate that PCA-CGAN not only achieves stable convergence on a large-scale heterogeneous dataset comprising 43 patients for the first time but also resolves the “dilution effect” problem in data augmentation, avoiding the asymmetric phenomenon where Precision increases while Recall decreases. After data augmentation, the ResNet model’s average F1 score improved significantly, with particularly outstanding performance on rare categories such as atrial premature beats, far surpassing traditional methods like SigCWGAN and TD-GAN. …”
-
3463
PCA-CGAN Pseudocode Table.
Published 2025“…Experiments demonstrate that PCA-CGAN not only achieves stable convergence on a large-scale heterogeneous dataset comprising 43 patients for the first time but also resolves the “dilution effect” problem in data augmentation, avoiding the asymmetric phenomenon where Precision increases while Recall decreases. After data augmentation, the ResNet model’s average F1 score improved significantly, with particularly outstanding performance on rare categories such as atrial premature beats, far surpassing traditional methods like SigCWGAN and TD-GAN. …”
-
3464
PCA-CGAN Ablation Experiment Results.
Published 2025“…Experiments demonstrate that PCA-CGAN not only achieves stable convergence on a large-scale heterogeneous dataset comprising 43 patients for the first time but also resolves the “dilution effect” problem in data augmentation, avoiding the asymmetric phenomenon where Precision increases while Recall decreases. After data augmentation, the ResNet model’s average F1 score improved significantly, with particularly outstanding performance on rare categories such as atrial premature beats, far surpassing traditional methods like SigCWGAN and TD-GAN. …”
-
3465
-
3466
Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3467
The analysis procedure.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3468
Model monitoring points and units coordinates.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3469
Soil mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3470
Parameters of the contact surface.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3471
The schematic diagram of free-field boundary.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3472
Residual deformation parameters of soil.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3473
Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3474
PL-Finn model development procedure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3475
Acoustic startle at 6 dpf.
Published 2025“…<p>(A-B) These graphs represent the area under the curve of the LLC response frequency. There are significant decreases in LLC responses in the 24+ (p < 0.0001) and 48+ (p ≤ 0.0001) fish. …”
-
3476
-
3477
-
3478
-
3479
-
3480