Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1201
-
1202
-
1203
Flow diagram of participants selection.
Published 2025“…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
-
1204
Minimal data set.
Published 2025“…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
-
1205
Weighted comparison of baseline characteristics.
Published 2025“…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
-
1206
Subcellular Mechanical Imaging of Erythrocytes with Optically Correlated Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy
Published 2025“…Comparison of normal and diamide-treated red blood cells shows a significant increase in cell stiffness and a concomitant decrease in deformability, clearly demonstrating the quantitative abilities of the correlative approach taken here for stiffness measurements of intact cellular samples.…”
-
1207
S1A Fig raw image.
Published 2025“…Here, we identify cathepsin Z (<i><i>Ctsz</i></i>) as a lead candidate underlying this TB susceptibility and show that <i><i>Ctsz</i></i> ablation leads to increased bacterial burden, pulmonary inflammation and decreased survival in mice. …”
-
1208
Group control-after intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1209
Group SFA-before intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1210
Lost cases.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1211
Group control-before intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1212
Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%).
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1213
Pre-Experiment.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1214
Group SFA-after intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1215
-
1216
-
1217
-
1218
-
1219
-
1220
Significance analysis data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) The manifestation of mining pressure in gangue backfill mining is influenced by factors such as mining height and backfill collapse ratio; (2) Under the support of coal gangue, the concentrated stress in the coal seam significantly decreases, forming an arched shape according to the mining stages; (3) The range of plastic failure in the coal seam remains relatively stable under gangue backfill mining, with the plastic zone of the roof plate exhibiting a strip-like distribution; (4) Both range analysis and variance analysis revealed that the sensitivity ranking is backfill collapse ratio > mining height > elastic modulus. …”