Showing 1,201 - 1,220 results of 18,566 for search 'significantly ((((((we decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (a decrease))) OR (linear decrease))', query time: 0.51s Refine Results
  1. 1201
  2. 1202
  3. 1203

    Flow diagram of participants selection. by Wei Huang (36889)

    Published 2025
    “…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
  4. 1204

    Minimal data set. by Wei Huang (36889)

    Published 2025
    “…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
  5. 1205

    Weighted comparison of baseline characteristics. by Wei Huang (36889)

    Published 2025
    “…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
  6. 1206

    Subcellular Mechanical Imaging of Erythrocytes with Optically Correlated Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy by Yunong Wang (10358970)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparison of normal and diamide-treated red blood cells shows a significant increase in cell stiffness and a concomitant decrease in deformability, clearly demonstrating the quantitative abilities of the correlative approach taken here for stiffness measurements of intact cellular samples.…”
  7. 1207

    S1A Fig raw image. by Rachel K. Meade (22216529)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, we identify cathepsin Z (<i><i>Ctsz</i></i>) as a lead candidate underlying this TB susceptibility and show that <i><i>Ctsz</i></i> ablation leads to increased bacterial burden, pulmonary inflammation and decreased survival in mice. …”
  8. 1208

    Group control-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  9. 1209

    Group SFA-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  10. 1210

    Lost cases. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  11. 1211

    Group control-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  12. 1212

    Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%). by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  13. 1213

    Pre-Experiment. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  14. 1214

    Group SFA-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  15. 1215
  16. 1216
  17. 1217
  18. 1218
  19. 1219
  20. 1220

    Significance analysis data. by Lei Zhu (16642)

    Published 2025
    “…The results indicate that: (1) The manifestation of mining pressure in gangue backfill mining is influenced by factors such as mining height and backfill collapse ratio; (2) Under the support of coal gangue, the concentrated stress in the coal seam significantly decreases, forming an arched shape according to the mining stages; (3) The range of plastic failure in the coal seam remains relatively stable under gangue backfill mining, with the plastic zone of the roof plate exhibiting a strip-like distribution; (4) Both range analysis and variance analysis revealed that the sensitivity ranking is backfill collapse ratio > mining height > elastic modulus. …”