Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
5441
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5442
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5443
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5444
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5445
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5446
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5447
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5448
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5449
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5450
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
5451
Droperidol is associated with reduced length of stay in the treatment of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome
Published 2025“…After adjustments, droperidol use was associated with a reduced length of stay (mean ratio 0.76; 95% CI: 0.62 0.94; <i>P</i> = 0.01), decreased total medication administration (OR 0.34; 95% CI: 0.20–0.58; <i>P <</i>0.001) and decreased usage of opioids (OR 0.16; 95% CI: 0.07–0.39; <i>P <</i>0.001). …”
-
5452
DATA ALL PARTICIPANTS.xlsx
Published 2024“…Across all ages, males completed fewer swallows, displayed greater average volumes per swallow, required significantly less time, and exhibited significantly less area under the curve when compared to females. …”
-
5453
Data Sheet 1_Cynaroside ameliorates TNBS-induced colitis by inhibiting intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis via the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway.pdf
Published 2025“…Combining network pharmacology prediction analysis with our validation data from animal models and colonic organoids, we demonstrated that Cyn significantly inhibits IEC apoptosis, as indicated by a decrease in the proportion of TUNEL-positive cells and changes in apoptosis-related protein levels. …”
-
5454
Data_Sheet_10_Global burden of multiple sclerosis and its attributable risk factors, 1990–2019.PDF
Published 2024“…At the regional level, a non-linear relationship was observed between the age-standardized DALY rate of MS and SDI.…”
-
5455
Data_Sheet_2_Global burden of multiple sclerosis and its attributable risk factors, 1990–2019.PDF
Published 2024“…At the regional level, a non-linear relationship was observed between the age-standardized DALY rate of MS and SDI.…”
-
5456
Data_Sheet_14_Global burden of multiple sclerosis and its attributable risk factors, 1990–2019.PDF
Published 2024“…At the regional level, a non-linear relationship was observed between the age-standardized DALY rate of MS and SDI.…”
-
5457
Image_1_Global burden of multiple sclerosis and its attributable risk factors, 1990–2019.JPEG
Published 2024“…At the regional level, a non-linear relationship was observed between the age-standardized DALY rate of MS and SDI.…”
-
5458
Data_Sheet_12_Global burden of multiple sclerosis and its attributable risk factors, 1990–2019.PDF
Published 2024“…At the regional level, a non-linear relationship was observed between the age-standardized DALY rate of MS and SDI.…”
-
5459
Table_1_Global burden of multiple sclerosis and its attributable risk factors, 1990–2019.DOC
Published 2024“…At the regional level, a non-linear relationship was observed between the age-standardized DALY rate of MS and SDI.…”
-
5460
Data_Sheet_3_Global burden of multiple sclerosis and its attributable risk factors, 1990–2019.PDF
Published 2024“…At the regional level, a non-linear relationship was observed between the age-standardized DALY rate of MS and SDI.…”