Search alternatives:
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
381
-
382
Projected global leukemia burden, 1990-2050.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Background: Leukemia is a prevalent form of cancer that encompasses four primary subtypes, posing significant health risks. …”
-
383
Correlation between HDI and EAPC.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Background: Leukemia is a prevalent form of cancer that encompasses four primary subtypes, posing significant health risks. …”
-
384
Global leukemia incidence and EAPC, 1990-2021.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Background: Leukemia is a prevalent form of cancer that encompasses four primary subtypes, posing significant health risks. …”
-
385
-
386
-
387
-
388
-
389
-
390
-
391
-
392
-
393
-
394
-
395
-
396
-
397
-
398
Patient enrollment and inclusion information.
Published 2025“…During chemotherapy, PVS decreased significantly from 3M to 12M. Subsequently, from 12M to FollowUp, PVS increased again. …”
-
399
<i>Aedes aegypti</i> database from SAGO traps.
Published 2025“…IVM treatment reduced the number of females per trap per week from 3.29 ± 0.24 to 2.41 ± 0.20 (33.7% reduction), AGO from 1.58 ± 0.17 to 0.25 ± 0.05 (85.2% reduction), and AGO + IVM from 1.49 ± 0.17 to 0.53 ± 0.08 (67.78% reduction), based on Henderson’s formula. We observed a non-significant increase in the control area (no treatment provided) in the mosquito populations, increasing from 2.94 ± 0.24 in the pretreatment period to 3.25 ± 0.28 of the post treatment period.…”
-
400