Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…Additionally, the effect of pressure variations (from 8 to 4 MPa at 288.2 K) was analyzed, revealing that a lower pressure decreases both the gas uptake and formation kinetics due to a reduced driving force. …”

Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…Additionally, the effect of pressure variations (from 8 to 4 MPa at 288.2 K) was analyzed, revealing that a lower pressure decreases both the gas uptake and formation kinetics due to a reduced driving force. …”

Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…Additionally, the effect of pressure variations (from 8 to 4 MPa at 288.2 K) was analyzed, revealing that a lower pressure decreases both the gas uptake and formation kinetics due to a reduced driving force. …”

Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…Additionally, the effect of pressure variations (from 8 to 4 MPa at 288.2 K) was analyzed, revealing that a lower pressure decreases both the gas uptake and formation kinetics due to a reduced driving force. …”

Correlation Plots Among TWOMBLI Outputs in (a) Combined samples, (b) AA samples, (c) C samples. by Zoë Dinkel (21402766)

Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…Additionally, the effect of pressure variations (from 8 to 4 MPa at 288.2 K) was analyzed, revealing that a lower pressure decreases both the gas uptake and formation kinetics due to a reduced driving force. …”

Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…Additionally, the effect of pressure variations (from 8 to 4 MPa at 288.2 K) was analyzed, revealing that a lower pressure decreases both the gas uptake and formation kinetics due to a reduced driving force. …”

Multi-strain model fitting based on data for influenza A and B cases from the 40th week of 2023 to the 17th week of 2024 in the United States. by Shuanglin Jing (11886368)

Comparison of phenotypes between adult control and <i>aP2-Drp1</i>^f/f mice. by Yuta Ibayashi (20404811)

<i>mMgat2</i> and <i>HuMgat2</i> mice become obese when fed a HFD. by J. Jose Corbalan (22439198)

Changes in growth characteristics (A = shoot fresh weight; B = shoot dry weight; C = root fresh weight; D = root dry weight) of M. stenopetala under drought conditions.... by Nadia Khater (22553166)

Decomposition analysis of the changes in prevalence (A), DALYs (B), and mortality (C) rates of IBD among women across global, 5 SDI and 21 GBD regions. by Jiefeng Zhao (9090305)

Changes in the expression of inflammatory cytokines in BALF of mice exposed to continuous CS inhalation. by Yue He (385239)

Changes in lung function of mice exposed to continuous inhalation of CS. by Yue He (385239)

Changes in inflammatory cell count in BALF of mice exposed to continuous CS inhalation. by Yue He (385239)

S1 Dataset - by Yue He (385239)

“…The expression of sRAGE increased in the early stage of smoke exposure and played a transient pro-inflammatory role. With long-term exposure to cigarette smoke, the inflammatory response is gradually aggravated in lung, and the expression of sRAGE is significantly decreased, and its reduction degree is closely related to the degree of reduced lung function and inflammation.…”

Changes in sRAGE levels in BALF after 120 consecutive days of CS exposure. by Yue He (385239)

Correlation between sRAGE levels and pulmonary dysfunction and inflammatory response in CS exposed 120 day group mice. by Yue He (385239)

Average parking inventory over a 24-hour period each day. by Zhendong Sun (4723221)

Experiment setting. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”