Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1161
-
1162
Association between screen time and demographic variables of respondents (n = 259).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1163
Association of screen time variables with mental health of respondents (n = 259).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1164
Association of screen time variables with sleep quality of respondents (n = 259).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1165
Frequency and percentage on screen time questionnaire of respondents (n = 259).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1166
-
1167
-
1168
-
1169
-
1170
Rates of change in each retinal layer thickness, calculated using linear mixed models.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1171
-
1172
-
1173
-
1174
Data Sheet 1_Irrigation, variety, and year exert a greater influence on organic potato production than microbial inoculation: case study results of a 2-year on-farm experiment.docx
Published 2025“…Concerning the effects of microbial inoculations, significant differences were observed only in plant stomatal conductance among all measured parameters: inoculation with T. asperelloides significantly decreased stomatal conductance in potato plants. …”
-
1175
-
1176
-
1177
-
1178
-
1179
-
1180
Renal outcomes of both treatment groups.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>During a mean follow-up of 11.9 months, 40.4% of the participants in the intervention group (31.6% in the control group) achieved diabetes control (HbA1c < 7%), with a significant mean difference of −0.36% in HbA1c levels between the groups (95% CI: −0.54 – −0.19, P < 0.01). …”