Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1421
Table 2_Relationship between plasma atherogenic index and subclinical hypothyroidism: an analysis of NHANES data and animal experiment.docx
Published 2025“…Weighted regression and linear models assessed associations between AIP (and its quartiles) and SCH and thyroid hormones. …”
-
1422
Data Sheet 1_Qifuyin alleviates anxiety and depression in 3×Tg-AD mice by modulating neuroendocrine function.zip
Published 2025“…In the QFY-treated group, plasma CORT levels were significantly decreased, whereas FSH and LH levels were significantly increased. …”
-
1423
Data Sheet 1_Metabolic adaptation fluctuates with different prediction equations: a secondary analysis based on a weight-loss clinical trial.docx
Published 2025“…Both Katch-McArdle-determined RMR and BIA-determined RMR presented a significant decrease between baseline and the end of the intervention (week 16). …”
-
1424
Table 1_Association of spicy food consumption with colorectal polyp and adenoma prevalence: findings from the Lanxi Pre-Colorectal Cancer Cohort (LP3C).docx
Published 2025“…Restricted cubic spline modeling revealed a non-linear relationship between spicy food intake and polyp risk (P for non-linearity < 0.001), characterized by initial risk elevation followed by a slight decrease with increasing consumption levels. …”
-
1425
S5 Fig - The human medial temporal lobe represents memory items in their ordinal position in both declarative and motor memory domains
Published 2025“…Planned pairwise comparisons indicate that in M1 and PMC, similarity values of the diagonal (i.e., lag 0, same position) were significantly larger than all other lags (i.e., lag 0 > all other lags, all <i>p</i><sub><i>corr</i></sub> < .05), while in the PHC, the diagonal was only significantly larger than lag 2 (<i>p</i><sub><i>corr</i></sub> < .05). …”
-
1426
Table 1_Refrigerator ownership and the nutrition-health trade-off: evidence from Chinese households.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Refrigerator ownership significantly increases daily calorie intake by 39.1%. …”
-
1427
Data_.xlsx
Published 2024“…Additionally, the asymmetry score exhibited a moderate decrease (∆46.96%, ES=0.64). In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the CG across all fitness measures. …”
-
1428
Table 1_Distinct response patterns of endothelial markers to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine are associated with the spike-specific IgG antibody production.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified two significantly distinct profiles of endothelial markers response, characterized by either increased or decreased serum levels of endocan and sVCAM. …”
-
1429
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1430
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1431
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1432
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1433
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1434
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1435
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1436
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1437
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1438
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1439
Data Sheet 1_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx
Published 2025“…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
-
1440
Table 3_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx
Published 2025“…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”