Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
1601
-
1602
-
1603
-
1604
-
1605
-
1606
-
1607
-
1608
-
1609
-
1610
-
1611
-
1612
-
1613
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
1614
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
1615
Supplementary file of datasets.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
1616
Summary statistics of key variables.
Published 2024“…Our results suggest the importance of addressing urban agglomeration costs as a means to facilitate innovative activity.</p></div>…”
-
1617
-
1618
Adverse event list.
Published 2025“…No statistically significant improvements were seen in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (mean decrease −0.73; 95% CI; −2.1, 0.62; <i>p</i> = 0.255), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (mean increase 0.09; 95% CI; −2.6, 2.8; <i>p</i> > 0.999), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (mean decrease −1.27; 95% CI; −3.8, 1.3; <i>p</i> = 0.257), and the Starkstein Apathy Scale (mean increase 0.36; 95% CI; −1.6, 2.4; <i>p</i> = 0.822). …”
-
1619
Patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…No statistically significant improvements were seen in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (mean decrease −0.73; 95% CI; −2.1, 0.62; <i>p</i> = 0.255), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (mean increase 0.09; 95% CI; −2.6, 2.8; <i>p</i> > 0.999), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (mean decrease −1.27; 95% CI; −3.8, 1.3; <i>p</i> = 0.257), and the Starkstein Apathy Scale (mean increase 0.36; 95% CI; −1.6, 2.4; <i>p</i> = 0.822). …”
-
1620