Showing 1,821 - 1,840 results of 18,132 for search 'significantly ((((larger decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (greater decrease))', query time: 0.71s Refine Results
  1. 1821

    Baseline characteristics of patients. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    Published 2025
    “…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
  2. 1822
  3. 1823
  4. 1824
  5. 1825
  6. 1826
  7. 1827

    Amplitude for A/L = 0.29. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
  8. 1828

    Amplitude for A/L = 0.338. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
  9. 1829

    Amplitude for A/L = 0.02. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
  10. 1830

    Amplitude for A/L = 0.03. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
  11. 1831

    Cohort characteristics. by Vincent Pey (21433304)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Upon initiation of CPB we observed a significant decrease in arterial whole blood redox potential (101.90 mV + /- 11.52 vs. 41.80 mV + /- 10,26; p < 0.0001). …”
  12. 1832

    Survey sample distribution. by Yin Liu (50073)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that: (1) Based on the counterfactual hypothesis, if the farmers who obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population are not loaned, their production and operating income will decrease by 3.31%, that is, microcredit has a significant income-increasing effect, and the income-increasing effect of obtaining microcredit for the poverty-alleviated population on the monitoring objects is greater than the households that have lifted out of poverty. (2) The mechanism of action shows that the microcredit policy for the poverty- alleviated population promotes income increase by promoting farmers to increase material capital investment and social capital investment. (3) The income-increasing effect of obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population on the low-income initial endowment farmers is greater than that on high-income initial endowment farmers, and farmers with low-land initial endowment have a higher income increase effect, that is, a ‘raising the low ‘ effect. …”
  13. 1833

    Variable definition and descriptive statistics. by Yin Liu (50073)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that: (1) Based on the counterfactual hypothesis, if the farmers who obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population are not loaned, their production and operating income will decrease by 3.31%, that is, microcredit has a significant income-increasing effect, and the income-increasing effect of obtaining microcredit for the poverty-alleviated population on the monitoring objects is greater than the households that have lifted out of poverty. (2) The mechanism of action shows that the microcredit policy for the poverty- alleviated population promotes income increase by promoting farmers to increase material capital investment and social capital investment. (3) The income-increasing effect of obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population on the low-income initial endowment farmers is greater than that on high-income initial endowment farmers, and farmers with low-land initial endowment have a higher income increase effect, that is, a ‘raising the low ‘ effect. …”
  14. 1834

    Robustness test. by Yin Liu (50073)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that: (1) Based on the counterfactual hypothesis, if the farmers who obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population are not loaned, their production and operating income will decrease by 3.31%, that is, microcredit has a significant income-increasing effect, and the income-increasing effect of obtaining microcredit for the poverty-alleviated population on the monitoring objects is greater than the households that have lifted out of poverty. (2) The mechanism of action shows that the microcredit policy for the poverty- alleviated population promotes income increase by promoting farmers to increase material capital investment and social capital investment. (3) The income-increasing effect of obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population on the low-income initial endowment farmers is greater than that on high-income initial endowment farmers, and farmers with low-land initial endowment have a higher income increase effect, that is, a ‘raising the low ‘ effect. …”
  15. 1835

    Analytical framework and statistical methods. by Na Chen (153323)

    Published 2024
    “…Our findings reveal significant variations in income insecurity and social protection responses across these groups. the pandemic had a significant impact on household incomes globally, with lower-middle-income countries experiencing the most significant income reductions. …”
  16. 1836

    Theoretical frameworks of social protection. by Na Chen (153323)

    Published 2024
    “…Our findings reveal significant variations in income insecurity and social protection responses across these groups. the pandemic had a significant impact on household incomes globally, with lower-middle-income countries experiencing the most significant income reductions. …”
  17. 1837
  18. 1838

    Genes show significant expression change in meta-analysis and their connection with Sjogren’s syndrome and thyroid cancer. by Fanyong Kong (20700261)

    Published 2025
    “…A gene in red indicates significantly increased expression in the meta-analysis, whereas a gene in blue indicates significantly decreased expression in the meta-analysis.…”
  19. 1839
  20. 1840