Showing 7,621 - 7,640 results of 18,518 for search 'significantly ((((larger decrease) OR (greater decrease))) OR (((a decrease) OR (mean decrease))))', query time: 0.67s Refine Results
  1. 7621
  2. 7622

    Basic features of microtopography. by Qingping Gou (22641045)

    Published 2025
    “…The results showed that: the difference of shallow soil moisture in different microtopographies on a slope surface was not significant, the difference of deep soil moisture was significant, and the soil moisture overuse was the largest in the gully (GU), amounting to 386.36 mm, and the smallest in the ephemeral gully (EG) (131.02 mm); the GU, the sink hole (SH), and the scarp (SC) showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing with the increase of soil depth, and the platform (PL) has little overall trend of change in soil moisture with the increase of soil depth, and the soil moisture of US and EG shows the trend of “decreasing-then increasing-then decreasing” with the increase of soil depth. …”
  3. 7623

    Soil bulk density of different microtopographies. by Qingping Gou (22641045)

    Published 2025
    “…The results showed that: the difference of shallow soil moisture in different microtopographies on a slope surface was not significant, the difference of deep soil moisture was significant, and the soil moisture overuse was the largest in the gully (GU), amounting to 386.36 mm, and the smallest in the ephemeral gully (EG) (131.02 mm); the GU, the sink hole (SH), and the scarp (SC) showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing with the increase of soil depth, and the platform (PL) has little overall trend of change in soil moisture with the increase of soil depth, and the soil moisture of US and EG shows the trend of “decreasing-then increasing-then decreasing” with the increase of soil depth. …”
  4. 7624
  5. 7625

    Distribution of study areas. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  6. 7626

    Descriptive statistics of variables. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  7. 7627

    Code. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  8. 7628

    Schematic of the conclusions. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  9. 7629

    Robustness test. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  10. 7630

    Data. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  11. 7631
  12. 7632

    Flowchart of the study population. by Emma Hertting (21568077)

    Published 2025
    “…Identified early-onset FGR had a decreased risk of stillbirth (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.96), an increased risk of severe newborn distress (aOR 2.80, 95% CI 1.79–4.39) and severe childhood outcome (aOR 3.00, 95% CI 1.51–5.94), compared to non-identified SGA/FGR. …”
  13. 7633
  14. 7634
  15. 7635
  16. 7636
  17. 7637
  18. 7638
  19. 7639
  20. 7640