Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
7481
-
7482
Basic features of microtopography.
Published 2025“…The results showed that: the difference of shallow soil moisture in different microtopographies on a slope surface was not significant, the difference of deep soil moisture was significant, and the soil moisture overuse was the largest in the gully (GU), amounting to 386.36 mm, and the smallest in the ephemeral gully (EG) (131.02 mm); the GU, the sink hole (SH), and the scarp (SC) showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing with the increase of soil depth, and the platform (PL) has little overall trend of change in soil moisture with the increase of soil depth, and the soil moisture of US and EG shows the trend of “decreasing-then increasing-then decreasing” with the increase of soil depth. …”
-
7483
Soil bulk density of different microtopographies.
Published 2025“…The results showed that: the difference of shallow soil moisture in different microtopographies on a slope surface was not significant, the difference of deep soil moisture was significant, and the soil moisture overuse was the largest in the gully (GU), amounting to 386.36 mm, and the smallest in the ephemeral gully (EG) (131.02 mm); the GU, the sink hole (SH), and the scarp (SC) showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing with the increase of soil depth, and the platform (PL) has little overall trend of change in soil moisture with the increase of soil depth, and the soil moisture of US and EG shows the trend of “decreasing-then increasing-then decreasing” with the increase of soil depth. …”
-
7484
-
7485
Distribution of study areas.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7486
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7487
Code.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7488
Schematic of the conclusions.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7489
Robustness test.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7490
Data.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7491
-
7492
Flowchart of the study population.
Published 2025“…Identified early-onset FGR had a decreased risk of stillbirth (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.96), an increased risk of severe newborn distress (aOR 2.80, 95% CI 1.79–4.39) and severe childhood outcome (aOR 3.00, 95% CI 1.51–5.94), compared to non-identified SGA/FGR. …”
-
7493
-
7494
-
7495
-
7496
Image1_The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster as a screening model for antiseizure medications.JPEG
Published 2024“…Here, we explore the efficacy of a broad spectrum of ASMs in suppressing seizure activity in two established Drosophila melanogaster bang-sensitive mutants. …”
-
7497
-
7498
-
7499
-
7500