Showing 1,561 - 1,580 results of 17,947 for search 'significantly ((((larger decrease) OR (teer decrease))) OR (((nn decrease) OR (a decrease))))', query time: 0.48s Refine Results
  1. 1561
  2. 1562
  3. 1563

    S1 Data - by Hao Deng (409186)

    Published 2024
    “…AA (OR = 3.016) and CA (OR = 2.130) genotypes were identified as risk factors for stage II. ERCC1 significantly decreased in processing of CWP. The cutoff value of ERCC1 was 5.265 pg/ml, with a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 86.7%. …”
  4. 1564

    Change in the genotypes of <i>ATM</i>, <i>ERCC1</i>, and <i>XRCC1</i>. by Hao Deng (409186)

    Published 2024
    “…AA (OR = 3.016) and CA (OR = 2.130) genotypes were identified as risk factors for stage II. ERCC1 significantly decreased in processing of CWP. The cutoff value of ERCC1 was 5.265 pg/ml, with a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 86.7%. …”
  5. 1565
  6. 1566
  7. 1567
  8. 1568

    Data. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    Published 2025
    “…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
  9. 1569

    Table 1_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, GCN correction additionally uncovered significant decreases of Lactobacillus and Faecalibacterium. …”
  10. 1570

    Table 3_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, GCN correction additionally uncovered significant decreases of Lactobacillus and Faecalibacterium. …”
  11. 1571

    Table 4_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, GCN correction additionally uncovered significant decreases of Lactobacillus and Faecalibacterium. …”
  12. 1572

    Table 8_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, GCN correction additionally uncovered significant decreases of Lactobacillus and Faecalibacterium. …”
  13. 1573

    Table 2_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, GCN correction additionally uncovered significant decreases of Lactobacillus and Faecalibacterium. …”
  14. 1574

    Table 6_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, GCN correction additionally uncovered significant decreases of Lactobacillus and Faecalibacterium. …”
  15. 1575

    Table 5_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, GCN correction additionally uncovered significant decreases of Lactobacillus and Faecalibacterium. …”
  16. 1576

    Table 7_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, GCN correction additionally uncovered significant decreases of Lactobacillus and Faecalibacterium. …”
  17. 1577

    Table 9_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, GCN correction additionally uncovered significant decreases of Lactobacillus and Faecalibacterium. …”
  18. 1578

    Baseline characteristics of patients. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    Published 2025
    “…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
  19. 1579
  20. 1580