Performance comparison of ML models. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Comparative data of different soil samples. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Confusion matrix of random forest model. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Sensor value scenario for fuzzy logic algorithm. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Evaluation metrics of selected ML models. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Block diagram of the proposed system. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Chart for applicable amount of fertilizers. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Cost analysis of irrigation controller unit. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Run times of two algorithms. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Mean scores and 95% CI of mental health symptoms, COVID-19 admissions and effect size during follow-up. by A. H. Ayesha Lavell (16734002)

Flow chart of Fuzzy Logic based control system. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Block diagram for IoT-based irrigation system. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Flow chart of Average Value-based control system. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Hardware design for IoT-based irrigation system. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”

Metric correlation matrix. by Chao Song (379006)

Characteristics of the study subjects (N = 39). by Layane S. P. Costa (22530327)

“…EELV increased in PL (+ 0.7 mL/kg PBW), PR (+2.0), and AR (+2.8), but decreased in AL (−2.3) (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001). In the bilateral protocol (n = 10, 70% male; 23.6 ± 3.2 years), regional ventilation showed no significant effects of position, ROI, or interaction (<i><i>p</i></i> > 0.05). …”

Flowchart of study. by Layane S. P. Costa (22530327)

“…EELV increased in PL (+ 0.7 mL/kg PBW), PR (+2.0), and AR (+2.8), but decreased in AL (−2.3) (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001). In the bilateral protocol (n = 10, 70% male; 23.6 ± 3.2 years), regional ventilation showed no significant effects of position, ROI, or interaction (<i><i>p</i></i> > 0.05). …”

Occurrence of subcortical immature neurons (scINs) in the amygdala of mouse and primates: relationship with evolution of subnuclei scaling and cortical connectomics. by Marco Ghibaudi (16701750)

RBM39 is methylated by PRMT6 at arginine 92. by Tongjia Zhang (16496661)

Analysis of differential microbiome and classification prediction model between case and control groups. by Chuan Zhang (187157)

“…<p><b>(A)</b> Linear discriminant analysis [LDA; (log10)>2] and (B) effect size (LEfSe) analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.01) in the microbiota of the case (orange, negative score) and control groups (blue, positive score) groups. …”