Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
less decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
less decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
2461
-
2462
Statistical summaries.
Published 2025“…In this study, it was shown for the first time that honeybees kept in apiaries have higher levels and activity of the studied parameters than honeybees kept in the laboratory. The greatest difference was noted in the case of PO activity in 28-day-old infected honeybees in May, when the activity was 32.3 times higher in honeybees kept in the apiary than in the laboratory, suggesting that environmental conditions have a significant influence on the immune response of honeybees. …”
-
2463
-
2464
-
2465
-
2466
-
2467
-
2468
Effect of fasudil on clinical outcomes of pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2024“…</p> <p>We conducted a systematic search in several databases. Meta-analysis using odds ratio and mean difference was performed, with an assessment of studies’ quality and pooled evidences.…”
-
2469
-
2470
Functional principle of a fiber Bragg grating.
Published 2025“…<div><p>To solve the problems of low detection efficiency and inability to adapt to distributed measurement in traditional detection methods, a water temperature field detection system based on a fiber Bragg grating string was designed. …”
-
2471
Split structural models for belief.
Published 2024“…More conservative political views and higher income correlated with decreased hesitancy. No other latent variables or covariates had a significant effect on vaccine hesitancy. …”
-
2472
-
2473
-
2474
Risk Illustration.
Published 2025“…However, patients prescribed P2Y12 antagonists (HR = 0.285, 95% CI: 0.135–0.603, p < 0.001), those with a GFR > 60 ml/min (HR = 0.314, 95% CI: 0.158–0.624, p < 0.001), and those with a higher ejection fraction (HR = 0.962, 95% CI: 0.939–0.986, p = 0.002) were less likely to experience SCD following CABG. …”
-
2475
Predictors of SCD.
Published 2025“…However, patients prescribed P2Y12 antagonists (HR = 0.285, 95% CI: 0.135–0.603, p < 0.001), those with a GFR > 60 ml/min (HR = 0.314, 95% CI: 0.158–0.624, p < 0.001), and those with a higher ejection fraction (HR = 0.962, 95% CI: 0.939–0.986, p = 0.002) were less likely to experience SCD following CABG. …”
-
2476
Clinical outcomes.
Published 2025“…However, patients prescribed P2Y12 antagonists (HR = 0.285, 95% CI: 0.135–0.603, p < 0.001), those with a GFR > 60 ml/min (HR = 0.314, 95% CI: 0.158–0.624, p < 0.001), and those with a higher ejection fraction (HR = 0.962, 95% CI: 0.939–0.986, p = 0.002) were less likely to experience SCD following CABG. …”
-
2477
Obesity and Depressed Ejection Fraction.
Published 2025“…However, patients prescribed P2Y12 antagonists (HR = 0.285, 95% CI: 0.135–0.603, p < 0.001), those with a GFR > 60 ml/min (HR = 0.314, 95% CI: 0.158–0.624, p < 0.001), and those with a higher ejection fraction (HR = 0.962, 95% CI: 0.939–0.986, p = 0.002) were less likely to experience SCD following CABG. …”
-
2478
Kaplan Meier curve.
Published 2025“…However, patients prescribed P2Y12 antagonists (HR = 0.285, 95% CI: 0.135–0.603, p < 0.001), those with a GFR > 60 ml/min (HR = 0.314, 95% CI: 0.158–0.624, p < 0.001), and those with a higher ejection fraction (HR = 0.962, 95% CI: 0.939–0.986, p = 0.002) were less likely to experience SCD following CABG. …”
-
2479
Study data.
Published 2025“…</p><p> Methods </p><p>We conducted a single-center, retrospective study during the COVID-19 outbreak in China, from December 7, 2022, to January 31, 2023. …”
-
2480
Summary of clinical outcomes after 9 months.
Published 2025“…</p><p> Methods </p><p>We conducted a single-center, retrospective study during the COVID-19 outbreak in China, from December 7, 2022, to January 31, 2023. …”