Showing 2,541 - 2,560 results of 18,406 for search 'significantly ((((less decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease))))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 2541
  2. 2542
  3. 2543
  4. 2544
  5. 2545
  6. 2546
  7. 2547
  8. 2548

    GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  9. 2549

    Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  10. 2550

    The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  11. 2551

    Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  12. 2552

    Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  13. 2553

    Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  14. 2554

    Analysis of subgroups. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  15. 2555

    Table 1_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  16. 2556

    Table 3_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  17. 2557

    Table 4_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  18. 2558

    Table 8_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  19. 2559

    Table 2_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  20. 2560

    Table 6_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”