Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1061
Summary of solver settings.
Published 2025“…However, at 1.0 MPa, the effect of blending ratio on atomization becomes less significant, with the difference in liquid film thickness reduced to 4.2%. …”
-
1062
Simulation parameters.
Published 2025“…However, at 1.0 MPa, the effect of blending ratio on atomization becomes less significant, with the difference in liquid film thickness reduced to 4.2%. …”
-
1063
Geometric parameters of the centrifugal nozzle.
Published 2025“…However, at 1.0 MPa, the effect of blending ratio on atomization becomes less significant, with the difference in liquid film thickness reduced to 4.2%. …”
-
1064
Data.
Published 2025“…However, at 1.0 MPa, the effect of blending ratio on atomization becomes less significant, with the difference in liquid film thickness reduced to 4.2%. …”
-
1065
Typical structure of a centrifugal nozzle [25].
Published 2025“…However, at 1.0 MPa, the effect of blending ratio on atomization becomes less significant, with the difference in liquid film thickness reduced to 4.2%. …”
-
1066
Cross-sectional velocity distribution contour.
Published 2025“…However, at 1.0 MPa, the effect of blending ratio on atomization becomes less significant, with the difference in liquid film thickness reduced to 4.2%. …”
-
1067
Mesh generation details.
Published 2025“…However, at 1.0 MPa, the effect of blending ratio on atomization becomes less significant, with the difference in liquid film thickness reduced to 4.2%. …”
-
1068
Image 9_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1069
Table 1_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.xlsx
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1070
Image 8_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1071
Image 5_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1072
Image 2_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1073
Image 3_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1074
Image 4_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1075
Image 11_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1076
Image 1_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1077
Image 10_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1078
Image 7_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1079
Image 6_Genomic, transcriptomic, and T cell receptor profiling in stratifying response to first-line chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.jpeg
Published 2025“…Richness was significantly decreased from pre-treat to post-treat.…”
-
1080
Image 1_Comparative analysis of gut microbiota in metabolic syndrome and obese children from Southeastern China.jpeg
Published 2024“…At the class and genus levels, we found that the relative abundance of c_Gammaproteobacteria increased with weight, whereas c_Bacteroidia and g_Bacteroides decreased. Notably, g_Faecalibacterium was significantly less abundant in the MS group compared to the other cohorts. …”