Showing 5,801 - 5,820 results of 18,406 for search 'significantly ((((less decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (((nn decrease) OR (a decrease))))', query time: 0.77s Refine Results
  1. 5801

    Data_Sheet_1_Urolithin A alleviates cell senescence by inhibiting ferroptosis and enhances corneal epithelial wound healing.zip by Xiao-Xiao Guo (6092141)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of RNA-seq of HS-induced corneal epithelial cells showed that the ferroptosis pathway was significantly dysregulated. Further investigation revealed that UA decreased the level of oxidative stress in HCE-T cells, including the levels of LPO and MDA (p < 0.05). …”
  2. 5802

    Testing set error. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  3. 5803

    Internal structure of an LSTM cell. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  4. 5804

    Prediction effect of each model after STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  5. 5805

    The kernel density plot for data of each feature. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  6. 5806

    Analysis of raw data prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  7. 5807

    Flowchart of the STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  8. 5808

    SARIMA predicts season components. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  9. 5809

    BWO-BiLSTM model prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  10. 5810

    Bi-LSTM architecture diagram. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  11. 5811

    STL Linear Combination Forecast Graph. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  12. 5812

    LOSS curves for BWO-BiLSTM model training. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  13. 5813

    Analysis of STL-PCA prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  14. 5814

    Accumulated contribution rate of PCA. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  15. 5815

    Figure of ablation experiment. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  16. 5816

    Flowchart of the STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM model. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  17. 5817

    Parameter optimization results of BiLSTM. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  18. 5818

    Descriptive statistical analysis of data. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  19. 5819

    The MAE value of the model under raw data. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  20. 5820

    Three error values under raw data. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”