Search alternatives:
less decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
less decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
1941
-
1942
-
1943
Related to Fig 3.
Published 2025“…(<b>Q</b>) Tumor growth kinetics recorded a significantly higher growth of BT-474_ZFX<sup>OE</sup> (mean ± SEM, <i>n</i> = 5) than BT-474_VECT<sup>OE</sup> tumors. …”
-
1944
-
1945
-
1946
-
1947
-
1948
The effect of IFN-β and Vit D on the IL-1β expression.
Published 2025“…In the co-treatment groups, a significant dose-dependent decrease was seen in the IL-1β expression <b>(C)</b>. …”
-
1949
-
1950
-
1951
-
1952
-
1953
-
1954
-
1955
-
1956
The effect of IFN-β and Vit D on the NF-κB gene expression.
Published 2025“…Two lower concentrations of Vit D induced a reduction in the NF-κB expression compared to the control, while the highest concentration increased it significantly <b>(B)</b>. In the co-treatment groups, a dose-dependent decrease pattern among different concentration was seen in the NF-κB expression, but generally it was increased compared to the control <b>(C)</b>. …”
-
1957
RICTOR regulates UGCG expression via transcription factor Zinc Finger X-linked (ZFX).
Published 2025“…<b>(T)</b> Tumor growth kinetics recorded a significantly higher growth of MCF-7_ZFX<sup>OE</sup> (mean ± SEM, <i>n</i> = 4-6) than MCF-7_VECT<sup>OE</sup> tumors. …”
-
1958
Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1959
Classification of hand grip strength.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1960
Rating scale for functional severity [28].
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”