Showing 1,201 - 1,220 results of 4,236 for search 'significantly ((((less decrease) OR (teer decrease))) OR (((nn decrease) OR (mean decrease))))', query time: 0.63s Refine Results
  1. 1201
  2. 1202
  3. 1203
  4. 1204
  5. 1205
  6. 1206

    Manuscript data. by Khalid A. Al-Gaadi (2826632)

    Published 2025
    “…Moreover, the total tomato fruit yield also decreased significantly at salinity-3 compared to salinity-1.…”
  7. 1207
  8. 1208
  9. 1209
  10. 1210
  11. 1211
  12. 1212
  13. 1213

    <b>Data for s</b><b>easonal variations in coral lipids and their significance for energy maintenance in the </b><b>South China Sea</b> by Hongyan Mo (19721569)

    Published 2024
    “…<p dir="ltr">In recent years, the intensification of global warming and extreme climate have led to an increase in the frequency and severity of coral bleaching. Coral bleaching means a decrease in symbiotic zooxanthellae density (ZD). …”
  14. 1214
  15. 1215
  16. 1216
  17. 1217
  18. 1218

    Data cleaning and preparation algorithm. by Ayana Ablayeva (22103708)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>Background</p><p>Liver cancer is the third-deadliest cancer globally, significantly affecting the Asian population, which accounts for 70% of cases. …”
  19. 1219

    Participant characteristics by village. by Tyler M. Barrett (20846174)

    Published 2025
    “…Nearly all participants reported perceiving increases in temperature (94%) and decreases in rainfall (91%) in the previous five years, and most reported that they expect to have much less (57%) or somewhat less (35%) food to feed their families in the future due to changes in temperature and rainfall. …”
  20. 1220

    Renal outcomes of both treatment groups. by Marwan El-Deyarbi (21688492)

    Published 2025
    “…Participants in the multifactorial group achieved a significant mean difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (mean difference = −0.14, 95% CI: −0.27–0.001, P < 0.03), and significant adjusted mean difference of eGFR levels difference (3.93 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI: 1.27–6.58, P < 0.01) at study completion compared to those in the control group. …”