Search alternatives:
less decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
less decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
3001
-
3002
-
3003
-
3004
-
3005
-
3006
-
3007
-
3008
-
3009
-
3010
-
3011
-
3012
-
3013
Table 1_Microglial adenosine A2A receptor in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus regulates pain sensation and analgesic effects independent of opioid and cannabinoid receptors.doc...
Published 2024“…Pharmacological activation of local PVT A<sub>2A</sub>R with its agonist CGS21680 induced significantly decreased 50% paw withdrawal threshold (50%PWTs) and paw withdrawal latency (PWLs), as measured by the Von Frey test and Hargreaves test in adult mice. …”
-
3014
Image 1_Microglial adenosine A2A receptor in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus regulates pain sensation and analgesic effects independent of opioid and cannabinoid receptors.tif
Published 2024“…Pharmacological activation of local PVT A<sub>2A</sub>R with its agonist CGS21680 induced significantly decreased 50% paw withdrawal threshold (50%PWTs) and paw withdrawal latency (PWLs), as measured by the Von Frey test and Hargreaves test in adult mice. …”
-
3015
Image 2_Microglial adenosine A2A receptor in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus regulates pain sensation and analgesic effects independent of opioid and cannabinoid receptors.tif
Published 2024“…Pharmacological activation of local PVT A<sub>2A</sub>R with its agonist CGS21680 induced significantly decreased 50% paw withdrawal threshold (50%PWTs) and paw withdrawal latency (PWLs), as measured by the Von Frey test and Hargreaves test in adult mice. …”
-
3016
-
3017
-
3018
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
3019
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
3020
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”