Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
6981
Direct Observation of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation and Core–Shell Morphology of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Collected from Three Northeast Asian Cities and Implications for N<sub>2</sub>O<s...
Published 2025“…As the shell becomes more viscous, the diffusivity of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> decreases, thereby lowering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake coefficient by 1–3 orders of magnitude and significantly restricting N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake. …”
-
6982
Direct Observation of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation and Core–Shell Morphology of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Collected from Three Northeast Asian Cities and Implications for N<sub>2</sub>O<s...
Published 2025“…As the shell becomes more viscous, the diffusivity of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> decreases, thereby lowering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake coefficient by 1–3 orders of magnitude and significantly restricting N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake. …”
-
6983
Direct Observation of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation and Core–Shell Morphology of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Collected from Three Northeast Asian Cities and Implications for N<sub>2</sub>O<s...
Published 2025“…As the shell becomes more viscous, the diffusivity of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> decreases, thereby lowering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake coefficient by 1–3 orders of magnitude and significantly restricting N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake. …”
-
6984
Direct Observation of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation and Core–Shell Morphology of PM<sub>2.5</sub> Collected from Three Northeast Asian Cities and Implications for N<sub>2</sub>O<s...
Published 2025“…As the shell becomes more viscous, the diffusivity of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> decreases, thereby lowering the N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake coefficient by 1–3 orders of magnitude and significantly restricting N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake. …”
-
6985
-
6986
Prediction of transition readiness.
Published 2025“…In most transition domains, help needed did not decrease with age and was not affected by function. …”
-
6987
Dataset visualization diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6988
Dataset sample images.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6989
Performance comparison of different models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6990
C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6991
YOLOv8n detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6992
YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6993
BiFormer structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6994
YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6995
GSConv module structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6996
Performance comparison of three loss functions.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6997
mAP0.5 Curves of various models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6998
Network loss function change diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6999
Comparative diagrams of different indicators.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
7000
YOLOv8n structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”