Showing 7,841 - 7,860 results of 18,042 for search 'significantly ((((linear decrease) OR (((a decrease) OR (nn decrease))))) OR (teer decrease))', query time: 0.57s Refine Results
  1. 7841

    Table 3_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.docx by Xu Yan (110026)

    Published 2025
    “…After sensitivity analyses using the Leave-One-Out method, two articles and one experiment were excluded with significant effect sizes. The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. …”
  2. 7842

    Supplementary file 2_Therapeutic effects of Balanites aegyptiaca DEL extract on diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.pdf by Olubukola Adebisi Odeniran (22162777)

    Published 2025
    “…Significant decrease in blood glucose level was recorded in Alloxan- and streptozotocin-induced rat/mice diabetes. …”
  3. 7843

    Table 2_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.docx by Xu Yan (110026)

    Published 2025
    “…After sensitivity analyses using the Leave-One-Out method, two articles and one experiment were excluded with significant effect sizes. The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. …”
  4. 7844

    Table 1_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.xlsx by Xu Yan (110026)

    Published 2025
    “…After sensitivity analyses using the Leave-One-Out method, two articles and one experiment were excluded with significant effect sizes. The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. …”
  5. 7845

    CONSORT diagram of the study. by Plaiwan Suttanon (4741197)

    Published 2024
    “…The control group showed a significant increase in COM angle sway excursion (lateral direction) (p = 0.011, d = 0.27, 95% CI [-0.19, 0.74]) and a decrease in TMT-A time (p = 0.031, d = 0.38, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.85]). …”
  6. 7846

    Quantification of faecal glucocorticoid metabolites as a measure of stress in the rock hyrax (Procavia capensis) living in an urban green space by Scheun, Juan (8229483)

    Published 2025
    “…Animal FID did not differ significantly between seasons but they did differ significantly between sections, and decreased in accordance with fGCM concentrations. …”
  7. 7847

    Analysis of differential microbiome and classification prediction model between case and control groups. by Chuan Zhang (187157)

    Published 2025
    “…<p><b>(A)</b> Linear discriminant analysis [LDA; (log10)>2] and (B) effect size (LEfSe) analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.01) in the microbiota of the case (orange, negative score) and control groups (blue, positive score) groups. …”
  8. 7848

    [A] Histopathological images of pancreas, liver, kidney, and heart tissues from the studied rat groups, stained with H&E. by Mohamed Lotfy (18599184)

    Published 2025
    “…Pancreas: Untreated diabetic rats show a reduction in the size of pancreatic islets of Langerhans (IL), correlated with a decrease in insulin-secreting beta cells. …”
  9. 7849

    Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units. by Jie Zhao (49409)

    Published 2025
    “…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
  10. 7850

    The analysis procedure. by Jie Zhao (49409)

    Published 2025
    “…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
  11. 7851

    Model monitoring points and units coordinates. by Jie Zhao (49409)

    Published 2025
    “…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
  12. 7852

    Soil mechanical parameters. by Jie Zhao (49409)

    Published 2025
    “…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
  13. 7853

    Parameters of the contact surface. by Jie Zhao (49409)

    Published 2025
    “…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
  14. 7854

    The schematic diagram of free-field boundary. by Jie Zhao (49409)

    Published 2025
    “…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
  15. 7855

    Residual deformation parameters of soil. by Jie Zhao (49409)

    Published 2025
    “…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
  16. 7856

    Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters. by Jie Zhao (49409)

    Published 2025
    “…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
  17. 7857

    PL-Finn model development procedure diagram. by Jie Zhao (49409)

    Published 2025
    “…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
  18. 7858

    Data Sheet 1_Efficacy and safety of reduning injection for severe pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.docx by Yan Wang (15435)

    Published 2025
    “…Objectives<p>Reduning (RDN) injection is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) extract injection commonly used as an adjunct therapy for severe pneumonia (SP) in clinical practice in China; however, further validation is required. …”
  19. 7859

    Data Sheet 1_Dysregulation of melatonin rhythm in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.docx by Reema Priyanka Suram (22399759)

    Published 2025
    “…In manifest HD, both amplitude [RoM = 0.92, 95% CI (0.81 to 1.02); p = 0.00] and acrophase [RoM = 0.92, 95% CI (0.07 to 1.78); p = 0.03] significantly decreased. PD patients with sleep disorders had significantly higher melatonin concentrations than the non-sleep disorder group, with a significant test group difference of p = 0.00. …”
  20. 7860

    Baseline characteristics of the study population. by Hanbin Wu (14016246)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to the normal group, women with preconception hypoglycemia had increased IPTW-multivariate adjusted ORs of PTB by 10% (95% CI [1.08, 1.12], <i>P</i> < 0.001), LBW by 8% (95% CI [1.03, 1.12], <i>P</i> = 0.001), SGA by 7% (95% CI [1.05, 1.08], <i>P</i> < 0.001), and birth defects by 21% (95% CI [1.06, 1.37], <i>P</i> = 0.004), while the ORs of medical abortion decreased by 6% (95% CI [0.91, 0.98], <i>P</i> = 0.002), miscarriage or early stillbirth by 5% (95% CI [0.92, 0.97], <i>P</i> < 0.001), macrosomia by 12% (95% CI [0.86, 0.90], <i>P</i> < 0.001), and LGA by 12% (95% CI [0.86, 0.89], <i>P</i> < 0.001) if mothers had a preconception hypoglycemia. …”