Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
7841
Table 3_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.docx
Published 2025“…After sensitivity analyses using the Leave-One-Out method, two articles and one experiment were excluded with significant effect sizes. The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. …”
-
7842
Supplementary file 2_Therapeutic effects of Balanites aegyptiaca DEL extract on diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.pdf
Published 2025“…Significant decrease in blood glucose level was recorded in Alloxan- and streptozotocin-induced rat/mice diabetes. …”
-
7843
Table 2_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.docx
Published 2025“…After sensitivity analyses using the Leave-One-Out method, two articles and one experiment were excluded with significant effect sizes. The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. …”
-
7844
Table 1_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.xlsx
Published 2025“…After sensitivity analyses using the Leave-One-Out method, two articles and one experiment were excluded with significant effect sizes. The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. …”
-
7845
CONSORT diagram of the study.
Published 2024“…The control group showed a significant increase in COM angle sway excursion (lateral direction) (p = 0.011, d = 0.27, 95% CI [-0.19, 0.74]) and a decrease in TMT-A time (p = 0.031, d = 0.38, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.85]). …”
-
7846
Quantification of faecal glucocorticoid metabolites as a measure of stress in the rock hyrax (Procavia capensis) living in an urban green space
Published 2025“…Animal FID did not differ significantly between seasons but they did differ significantly between sections, and decreased in accordance with fGCM concentrations. …”
-
7847
Analysis of differential microbiome and classification prediction model between case and control groups.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Linear discriminant analysis [LDA; (log10)>2] and (B) effect size (LEfSe) analysis revealed significant differences (P < 0.01) in the microbiota of the case (orange, negative score) and control groups (blue, positive score) groups. …”
-
7848
[A] Histopathological images of pancreas, liver, kidney, and heart tissues from the studied rat groups, stained with H&E.
Published 2025“…Pancreas: Untreated diabetic rats show a reduction in the size of pancreatic islets of Langerhans (IL), correlated with a decrease in insulin-secreting beta cells. …”
-
7849
Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
7850
The analysis procedure.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
7851
Model monitoring points and units coordinates.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
7852
Soil mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
7853
Parameters of the contact surface.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
7854
The schematic diagram of free-field boundary.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
7855
Residual deformation parameters of soil.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
7856
Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
7857
PL-Finn model development procedure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
7858
Data Sheet 1_Efficacy and safety of reduning injection for severe pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.docx
Published 2025“…Objectives<p>Reduning (RDN) injection is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) extract injection commonly used as an adjunct therapy for severe pneumonia (SP) in clinical practice in China; however, further validation is required. …”
-
7859
Data Sheet 1_Dysregulation of melatonin rhythm in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.docx
Published 2025“…In manifest HD, both amplitude [RoM = 0.92, 95% CI (0.81 to 1.02); p = 0.00] and acrophase [RoM = 0.92, 95% CI (0.07 to 1.78); p = 0.03] significantly decreased. PD patients with sleep disorders had significantly higher melatonin concentrations than the non-sleep disorder group, with a significant test group difference of p = 0.00. …”
-
7860
Baseline characteristics of the study population.
Published 2025“…Compared to the normal group, women with preconception hypoglycemia had increased IPTW-multivariate adjusted ORs of PTB by 10% (95% CI [1.08, 1.12], <i>P</i> < 0.001), LBW by 8% (95% CI [1.03, 1.12], <i>P</i> = 0.001), SGA by 7% (95% CI [1.05, 1.08], <i>P</i> < 0.001), and birth defects by 21% (95% CI [1.06, 1.37], <i>P</i> = 0.004), while the ORs of medical abortion decreased by 6% (95% CI [0.91, 0.98], <i>P</i> = 0.002), miscarriage or early stillbirth by 5% (95% CI [0.92, 0.97], <i>P</i> < 0.001), macrosomia by 12% (95% CI [0.86, 0.90], <i>P</i> < 0.001), and LGA by 12% (95% CI [0.86, 0.89], <i>P</i> < 0.001) if mothers had a preconception hypoglycemia. …”