Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
2301
Annual treatment frequencies in all eyes.
Published 2025“…Outpatient visit frequency also significantly declined from 11.5 ± 4.3 visits in the year before surgery to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a>).…”
-
2302
Time course of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…CRT in the recurrence group significantly decreased from 546.1 ± 117.0 μm preoperatively to 317.1 ± 46.9, 317.8 ± 55.6, 290.8 ± 33.5, 342.9 ± 82.2, 333.0 ± 84.2, and 349.8 ± 76.9 μm at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). …”
-
2303
-
2304
-
2305
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…Regarding the mean number of treatments in the recurrence group, anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatment counts in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. These values significantly decreased in the first postoperative year to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0, and 3.1 ± 2.8; in the second year to 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8; and in the third year to 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). …”
-
2306
-
2307
-
2308
-
2309
-
2310
-
2311
-
2312
Table 1_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2313
Table 3_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2314
Table 4_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2315
Table 8_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2316
Table 2_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2317
Table 6_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2318
Table 5_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2319
Table 7_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2320
Table 9_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”