Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
2321
-
2322
Data for Fig 1.
Published 2025“…We also observe a significant decrease in survival in animals that progress to >10% cancer in their hemolymph, while we see no effect on survival in clams with BTN that are long-term non-progressors. …”
-
2323
-
2324
-
2325
-
2326
-
2327
-
2328
-
2329
-
2330
Micelle and Inverse Micelle Structure Driven Viscoelasticity and Phase Separation in 2‑Isobutoxyethanol–Water Mixtures: Insights from All-Atom Simulations
Published 2025“…Structural analyses, including radial distribution functions (RDFs) and potentials of mean force (PMFs), reveal that hydrogen bonds between IBE-water are significantly stronger than those in IBE–IBE and water–water pairs, as evidenced by higher RDF peak intensities, deeper contact minima, and slower hydrogen-bond autocorrelation decay. …”
-
2331
Micelle and Inverse Micelle Structure Driven Viscoelasticity and Phase Separation in 2‑Isobutoxyethanol–Water Mixtures: Insights from All-Atom Simulations
Published 2025“…Structural analyses, including radial distribution functions (RDFs) and potentials of mean force (PMFs), reveal that hydrogen bonds between IBE-water are significantly stronger than those in IBE–IBE and water–water pairs, as evidenced by higher RDF peak intensities, deeper contact minima, and slower hydrogen-bond autocorrelation decay. …”
-
2332
-
2333
-
2334
-
2335
-
2336
-
2337
-
2338
Regional Characteristics in Ultradeep MXene Slit Nanopores: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Published 2025“…As the interlayer spacing varies, the ion distribution in the electrode pores exhibits regional characteristics: in the ordered region near the bulk region, a stable electrical double-layer (EDL) structure is maintained, whereas in the deeper mixed region, persistent co-ion presence and significant disorder are observed. Dominated by the mixed region, the total energy variation of the electrode decreases as the interlayer spacing decreases, with energy changes of 8526.52, 7443.52, and 6640.99 kJ·mol<sup>–1</sup> at interlayer spacings of 1.2, 1.0, and 0.8 nm, respectively, representing reductions of approximately 12.7 and 22.1% compared to 1.2 nm. …”
-
2339
Regional Characteristics in Ultradeep MXene Slit Nanopores: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Published 2025“…As the interlayer spacing varies, the ion distribution in the electrode pores exhibits regional characteristics: in the ordered region near the bulk region, a stable electrical double-layer (EDL) structure is maintained, whereas in the deeper mixed region, persistent co-ion presence and significant disorder are observed. Dominated by the mixed region, the total energy variation of the electrode decreases as the interlayer spacing decreases, with energy changes of 8526.52, 7443.52, and 6640.99 kJ·mol<sup>–1</sup> at interlayer spacings of 1.2, 1.0, and 0.8 nm, respectively, representing reductions of approximately 12.7 and 22.1% compared to 1.2 nm. …”
-
2340
Regional Characteristics in Ultradeep MXene Slit Nanopores: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Published 2025“…As the interlayer spacing varies, the ion distribution in the electrode pores exhibits regional characteristics: in the ordered region near the bulk region, a stable electrical double-layer (EDL) structure is maintained, whereas in the deeper mixed region, persistent co-ion presence and significant disorder are observed. Dominated by the mixed region, the total energy variation of the electrode decreases as the interlayer spacing decreases, with energy changes of 8526.52, 7443.52, and 6640.99 kJ·mol<sup>–1</sup> at interlayer spacings of 1.2, 1.0, and 0.8 nm, respectively, representing reductions of approximately 12.7 and 22.1% compared to 1.2 nm. …”