Showing 2,321 - 2,340 results of 10,117 for search 'significantly ((((linear decrease) OR (((we decrease) OR (mean decrease))))) OR (greater decrease))', query time: 0.50s Refine Results
  1. 2321
  2. 2322

    Data for Fig 1. by Rachael M. Giersch (22331947)

    Published 2025
    “…We also observe a significant decrease in survival in animals that progress to >10% cancer in their hemolymph, while we see no effect on survival in clams with BTN that are long-term non-progressors. …”
  3. 2323
  4. 2324
  5. 2325
  6. 2326
  7. 2327
  8. 2328
  9. 2329
  10. 2330

    Micelle and Inverse Micelle Structure Driven Viscoelasticity and Phase Separation in 2‑Isobutoxyethanol–Water Mixtures: Insights from All-Atom Simulations by Mayank Dixit (7879364)

    Published 2025
    “…Structural analyses, including radial distribution functions (RDFs) and potentials of mean force (PMFs), reveal that hydrogen bonds between IBE-water are significantly stronger than those in IBE–IBE and water–water pairs, as evidenced by higher RDF peak intensities, deeper contact minima, and slower hydrogen-bond autocorrelation decay. …”
  11. 2331

    Micelle and Inverse Micelle Structure Driven Viscoelasticity and Phase Separation in 2‑Isobutoxyethanol–Water Mixtures: Insights from All-Atom Simulations by Mayank Dixit (7879364)

    Published 2025
    “…Structural analyses, including radial distribution functions (RDFs) and potentials of mean force (PMFs), reveal that hydrogen bonds between IBE-water are significantly stronger than those in IBE–IBE and water–water pairs, as evidenced by higher RDF peak intensities, deeper contact minima, and slower hydrogen-bond autocorrelation decay. …”
  12. 2332
  13. 2333
  14. 2334
  15. 2335
  16. 2336
  17. 2337
  18. 2338

    Regional Characteristics in Ultradeep MXene Slit Nanopores: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Kaiqing Sun (18715965)

    Published 2025
    “…As the interlayer spacing varies, the ion distribution in the electrode pores exhibits regional characteristics: in the ordered region near the bulk region, a stable electrical double-layer (EDL) structure is maintained, whereas in the deeper mixed region, persistent co-ion presence and significant disorder are observed. Dominated by the mixed region, the total energy variation of the electrode decreases as the interlayer spacing decreases, with energy changes of 8526.52, 7443.52, and 6640.99 kJ·mol<sup>–1</sup> at interlayer spacings of 1.2, 1.0, and 0.8 nm, respectively, representing reductions of approximately 12.7 and 22.1% compared to 1.2 nm. …”
  19. 2339

    Regional Characteristics in Ultradeep MXene Slit Nanopores: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Kaiqing Sun (18715965)

    Published 2025
    “…As the interlayer spacing varies, the ion distribution in the electrode pores exhibits regional characteristics: in the ordered region near the bulk region, a stable electrical double-layer (EDL) structure is maintained, whereas in the deeper mixed region, persistent co-ion presence and significant disorder are observed. Dominated by the mixed region, the total energy variation of the electrode decreases as the interlayer spacing decreases, with energy changes of 8526.52, 7443.52, and 6640.99 kJ·mol<sup>–1</sup> at interlayer spacings of 1.2, 1.0, and 0.8 nm, respectively, representing reductions of approximately 12.7 and 22.1% compared to 1.2 nm. …”
  20. 2340

    Regional Characteristics in Ultradeep MXene Slit Nanopores: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Kaiqing Sun (18715965)

    Published 2025
    “…As the interlayer spacing varies, the ion distribution in the electrode pores exhibits regional characteristics: in the ordered region near the bulk region, a stable electrical double-layer (EDL) structure is maintained, whereas in the deeper mixed region, persistent co-ion presence and significant disorder are observed. Dominated by the mixed region, the total energy variation of the electrode decreases as the interlayer spacing decreases, with energy changes of 8526.52, 7443.52, and 6640.99 kJ·mol<sup>–1</sup> at interlayer spacings of 1.2, 1.0, and 0.8 nm, respectively, representing reductions of approximately 12.7 and 22.1% compared to 1.2 nm. …”