Showing 661 - 680 results of 7,748 for search 'significantly ((((linear decrease) OR (((we decrease) OR (nn decrease))))) OR (greater decrease))', query time: 0.65s Refine Results
  1. 661
  2. 662
  3. 663
  4. 664
  5. 665
  6. 666
  7. 667
  8. 668
  9. 669
  10. 670
  11. 671
  12. 672
  13. 673
  14. 674
  15. 675

    Flow diagram of participants selection. by Wei Huang (36889)

    Published 2025
    “…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
  16. 676

    Minimal data set. by Wei Huang (36889)

    Published 2025
    “…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
  17. 677

    Weighted comparison of baseline characteristics. by Wei Huang (36889)

    Published 2025
    “…Each10 units increase in BRI, ASM/ BMI decreased by 29% (β = −0.29,95% CI: −0.31, −0.28, <i><i>p</i></i> value < 0.0001). …”
  18. 678

    Description of the warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  19. 679

    Flow chart of the study. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  20. 680

    Summary statistics of the sample. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”