Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
2121
-
2122
-
2123
-
2124
-
2125
-
2126
Sociodemographic characteristics.
Published 2024“…Increased circadian preference for eveningness and social jet lag were noted. A significant decrease in sleep duration and sleep efficiency, along with an increased prevalence of insomnia and daytime sleepiness, was noted with age- and sex-specific variations.…”
-
2127
Study flow chart.
Published 2024“…Increased circadian preference for eveningness and social jet lag were noted. A significant decrease in sleep duration and sleep efficiency, along with an increased prevalence of insomnia and daytime sleepiness, was noted with age- and sex-specific variations.…”
-
2128
-
2129
-
2130
-
2131
-
2132
-
2133
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…AA (OR = 3.016) and CA (OR = 2.130) genotypes were identified as risk factors for stage II. ERCC1 significantly decreased in processing of CWP. The cutoff value of ERCC1 was 5.265 pg/ml, with a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 86.7%. …”
-
2134
Change in the genotypes of <i>ATM</i>, <i>ERCC1</i>, and <i>XRCC1</i>.
Published 2024“…AA (OR = 3.016) and CA (OR = 2.130) genotypes were identified as risk factors for stage II. ERCC1 significantly decreased in processing of CWP. The cutoff value of ERCC1 was 5.265 pg/ml, with a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 86.7%. …”
-
2135
-
2136
-
2137
Cross-sectional dependence results.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
2138
Autocorrelation test results.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
2139
Pesaran’s CADF test results for Model I.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
2140
Descriptive statistics of related variables.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”