Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
981
Summary of related works.
Published 2025“…Results show that SIDFM reduces navigation errors by 12.09% at low acceleration and 11.43% at high acceleration while also significantly decreasing positioning errors. These improvements enhance the stability, precision, and safety of AGVs in dynamic manufacturing environments. …”
-
982
Research methodology flow diagram.
Published 2025“…Results show that SIDFM reduces navigation errors by 12.09% at low acceleration and 11.43% at high acceleration while also significantly decreasing positioning errors. These improvements enhance the stability, precision, and safety of AGVs in dynamic manufacturing environments. …”
-
983
Positioning error analysis.
Published 2025“…Results show that SIDFM reduces navigation errors by 12.09% at low acceleration and 11.43% at high acceleration while also significantly decreasing positioning errors. These improvements enhance the stability, precision, and safety of AGVs in dynamic manufacturing environments. …”
-
984
Error-Bar graph.
Published 2025“…Results show that SIDFM reduces navigation errors by 12.09% at low acceleration and 11.43% at high acceleration while also significantly decreasing positioning errors. These improvements enhance the stability, precision, and safety of AGVs in dynamic manufacturing environments. …”
-
985
A Hydrate-Bearing Sediment Gas Replacement Mechanical Behavior Regulation Mechanism and Slope Stability Analysis
Published 2025“…As saturation increases, the Γ value of the critical state line decreases, while the λ value increases. (3) For slope simulations, increased hydrate saturation significantly raises the safety factor for gentler slopes, while the reinforcing effect of gas replacement is weaker for steeper slopes with higher saturation.…”
-
986
A Hydrate-Bearing Sediment Gas Replacement Mechanical Behavior Regulation Mechanism and Slope Stability Analysis
Published 2025“…As saturation increases, the Γ value of the critical state line decreases, while the λ value increases. (3) For slope simulations, increased hydrate saturation significantly raises the safety factor for gentler slopes, while the reinforcing effect of gas replacement is weaker for steeper slopes with higher saturation.…”
-
987
Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA).
Published 2025“…Analysis of bacterial abundance revealed a shift in trends as the disease combined from control to NSESKD and SESKD group, respectively, across 7 genera: <i><i>Actinobacillus</i></i>, <i>TM7x</i>, <i><i>Capnocytophaga</i></i>, <i><i>Neisseria</i></i>, and <i><i>Leptotrichia</i></i> increased in abundance, while <i><i>Actinomyces</i></i> and <i><i>Atopobium</i></i> decreased. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) identified <i><i>Leptotrichia</i></i> as a potential biomarker for ESKD (both with and without sarcopenia).…”
-
988
Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Soot Formation in the Laminar to Turbulent Transition of an Acetylene Diffusion Flame
Published 2025“…Results from different regimes indicate the following: (1) In the laminar state, <i>ṁ</i><sub>soot</sub> increased linearly with <i>Re</i>, with a growth rate positively correlated with the tube diameter. (2) After entering the transitional state, <i>ṁ</i><sub>soot</sub> decreased exponentially by over 95%; <i>T</i> gradually increased by 150 K; and both SPL and the standard deviation of <i>T</i> (σ<sub><i>T</i></sub>) initially rose and then declined. (3) After entering the fully turbulent state, SPL increased again whereas σ<sub><i>T</i></sub> stabilized at 14. …”
-
989
-
990
-
991
Mexican warning label system.
Published 2024“…Similarly, the FOPWL decreased the perceived healthiness of both nectar with “excess sugars” and nectar with NNS. …”
-
992
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…Similarly, the FOPWL decreased the perceived healthiness of both nectar with “excess sugars” and nectar with NNS. …”
-
993
Images with FOPWL by time of data collection.
Published 2024“…Similarly, the FOPWL decreased the perceived healthiness of both nectar with “excess sugars” and nectar with NNS. …”
-
994
-
995
Benchmark regression results.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
996
Heterogeneity test.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
997
S1 File -
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
998
The robustness test.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
999
Mechanistic testing.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
1000
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”